From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
To: "Jack Harvard" <jack.harvard@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() resolution in Linux?
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260804100907i58fa5d36ma0cb415c10054a2d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a72f6a3c0804100740s687beacbh80653107f4a7b702@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jack Harvard
<jack.harvard@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I would like to ask a few questions about how Linux keeps time.
>
> As far as I understand,
> 1. Linux's time resolution is 10ms, as defined by HZ=100.
> 2. gettimeofday() can get time in microseconds, but I'm not sure about
> the accuracy of the time finer than 10ms. Sometimes gettimeofday( )
> can even give me microseconds results rolled backwards in time, which
> I suspect could be caused by its accuracy. My question here is "how
> accurate is the time from gettimeofday()"
> 3. If I want to increase the time resolution to 1ms, I can possibly
> change HZ=1000, but if I want 1usec resolution, how can I do that? It
> would be too busy for the processor to handle so frequent timer
> interrupts if I just increase HZ=1000000.
You should use clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) instead of
gettimeofday() for interval timing. As soon as NTP software is
running, the result of gettimeofday() can jump forward or backward in
time. The result of clock_gettime() is guaranteed to be monotonic, and
additionally the resolution of clock_gettime() is higher than
gettimeofday() -- 1 ns instead of 1 us.
Changing HZ only makes sense on very old hardware that does not have a
TSC or equivalent register (e.g. the Intel 486 CPU).
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 14:40 Jack Harvard
2008-04-10 15:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-04-10 15:35 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 15:59 ` Jack Harvard
2008-04-10 17:41 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <a72f6a3c0804101057i10c572bak1dd09f0c7fd75d30@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-10 18:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-10 15:49 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-10 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2e108260804100907i58fa5d36ma0cb415c10054a2d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=jack.harvard@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®