mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
To: "Jack Harvard" <jack.harvard@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() resolution in Linux?
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260804100907i58fa5d36ma0cb415c10054a2d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a72f6a3c0804100740s687beacbh80653107f4a7b702@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Jack Harvard
<jack.harvard@googlemail.com> wrote:
>  I would like to ask a few questions about how Linux keeps time.
>
>  As far as I understand,
>  1. Linux's time resolution is 10ms, as defined by HZ=100.
>  2. gettimeofday() can get time in microseconds, but I'm not sure about
>  the accuracy of the time finer than 10ms. Sometimes gettimeofday( )
>  can even give me microseconds results rolled backwards in time, which
>  I suspect could be caused by its accuracy. My question here is "how
>  accurate is the time from gettimeofday()"
>  3. If I want to increase the time resolution to 1ms, I can possibly
>  change HZ=1000, but if I want 1usec resolution, how can I do that? It
>  would be too busy for the processor to handle so frequent timer
>  interrupts if I just increase HZ=1000000.

You should use clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) instead of
gettimeofday() for interval timing. As soon as NTP software is
running, the result of gettimeofday() can jump forward or backward in
time. The result of clock_gettime() is guaranteed to be monotonic, and
additionally the resolution of clock_gettime() is higher than
gettimeofday() -- 1 ns instead of 1 us.

Changing HZ only makes sense on very old hardware that does not have a
TSC or equivalent register (e.g. the Intel 486 CPU).

Bart.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-10 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-10 14:40 Jack Harvard
2008-04-10 15:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2008-04-10 15:35   ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-10 15:59   ` Jack Harvard
2008-04-10 17:41     ` Bart Van Assche
     [not found]       ` <a72f6a3c0804101057i10c572bak1dd09f0c7fd75d30@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-10 18:02         ` Bart Van Assche
2008-04-10 15:49 ` Chris Friesen
2008-04-10 16:07 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2e108260804100907i58fa5d36ma0cb415c10054a2d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack.harvard@googlemail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®