From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762487AbYECJlw (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:41:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758950AbYECJln (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:41:43 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:2835 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758735AbYECJlm (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 05:41:42 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QjzdEdcCDtiiE+MubqkZ6LSJ9XCjBDHhTsvJ+LjIXIDEup0SV7f6Mad0Dhm9IGg/l8bZB/QNMtE9Sg/q8uG8+aH0vYOMXRajuSzqo3R37PE1aTf4cjadqz0WMecNL0MiiFdV0WLAHSsjsYS+7Rws473PJgTs7DOPc9UxAZDpwgw= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 11:41:41 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: "FUJITA Tomonori" Subject: Re: SCSI target subsystem Cc: "James Bottomley" , "Christoph Hellwig" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" In-Reply-To: <481B5AB8.5030108@vlnb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> <1209745084.3121.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <481B5AB8.5030108@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > I wrote all above to support my at first glance shocking conclusion that > SCSI target subsystem is completely new subsystem of the kernel and it > should live on its own with its own maintainer! This is the same as with the > current interaction between SCSI and block subsystems in the kernel: SCSI > uses block's functionality, but that doesn't mean that block and SCSI are > the same subsystem. Hello Tomo, Due to the IET and STGT projects you have a lot of experience with implementing SCSI target frameworks. What is your opinion about how a kernel space SCSI target framework should fit in the Linux kernel ? Bart.