From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764959AbYECKje (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 06:39:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761726AbYECKjW (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 06:39:22 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:7139 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761709AbYECKjU (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 May 2008 06:39:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sCITCB56nLEUPRpU581UfKGuwr/uhMBfAiWgVXqw36YsV0rQP2wg5/jvQZnSzO0upSJqbhwB9UXsqoc846VcNCzQ3CnniK6UmoX4O7ULKUbdt97NgzC2QUVff+ybLrmiOcnM+KbpvUqkwCM6onLBrLaDY71T/WfVW4Pt9IO7EAI= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 12:39:19 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: "Matthew Wilcox" Subject: Re: SCSI target subsystem Cc: "FUJITA Tomonori" , "James Bottomley" , "Christoph Hellwig" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" In-Reply-To: <20080503095314.GX14976@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> <1209745084.3121.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <481B5AB8.5030108@vlnb.net> <20080503095314.GX14976@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Bart, what is your role in the SCST project? You don't seem to have > contributed any code to it (going by the SVN logs on sourceforge), and > your questions and suggestions seem to be those of someone not familiar > with the code. If you're not a developer, it might be more helpful for > you to step back and let Vladislav handle this. I'd like to see this discussion focus on the technical issues. Why are people constantly throwing up political arguments in this discussion ? To answer your question: as you noticed, I did not yet contribute any code to the SCST project. I'm an iSCSI/iSER/SRP user. I'd like to have a SCSI target framework available on Linux that is as fast as possible, as reliable as possible, as standards compliant as possible, well maintained and for which all kernel code is integrated in the mainstream Linux kernel. I'm probably sharing this desire with all STGT, IET, SCST and LIO users. Do you consider the opinion of SCSI target framework users irrelevant in this discussion ? Bart.