From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757176AbYEVQie (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 12:38:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755382AbYEVQiW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 12:38:22 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.188]:27957 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756180AbYEVQiU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 12:38:20 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Z6k+iPh6KDdUGMq06KvNMfGYo+EmBzbzIvLLBNguu6qePwYB7Rh49+9qhdqq+W2Afa29WUpggp145S26CcvI8VmGQTLqEJ7dn9ORPCYApif6MGU8j3Cy43MYE4FyZdQSjPBqZUTj2Ae73OPyVD2GiyY8RRp9U9mVaN8H69OPBDw= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 18:38:18 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: "Stefan Richter" Subject: Re: Number of bugs - statistics Cc: "Adrian Bunk" , "Arjan van de Ven" , "Bosko Radivojevic" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Natalie Protasevich" In-Reply-To: <48359DE1.8050600@s5r6.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080522144114.GC27301@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080522075135.4933161c@infradead.org> <20080522155425.GA2727@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <48359DE1.8050600@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Bosko Radivojevic wrote: > Is there any kind of analysis of number of (reported or resolved) bugs > through time in Linux kernel floating around? I'm trying to convince > my colleagues that newer kernel version does not mean more bugs than > the previous 'well tested' ones. The following summary of a speech by Andrew Morton contains good arguments as why you should use a recent kernel: http://lwn.net/Articles/278647/ Bart.