From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754667AbYLNQxV (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:53:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753508AbYLNQxI (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:53:08 -0500 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:5834 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753349AbYLNQxG (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:53:06 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=aAPYbGZqk5lENmqmCi+TVdABJJM895BVzLmnncYWx8ULtCRgAyR+gGfKR7Wnmsv1VB lyxVYuSZs6tT1iHBNSXVBcq5urj+aXW/N3g5jeJGKg4Db+9rMSH73ZhcXX1YdJg9UyVO PT/AI9fnaoxccMhlpVThKY5T8R6NO2poPuRko= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:53:04 +0100 From: "Bart Van Assche" To: linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Announce]: Target_Core_Mod/ConfigFS and LIO-Target v3.0 work Cc: James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, LKML , linux-scsi , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Christoph Hellwig" , "FUJITA Tomonori" , "Mike Christie" , "Hannes Reinecke" , "Jens Axboe" , "Vladislav Bolkhovitin" In-Reply-To: <1229208606.4153.1069.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1228965271.4153.510.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1229074809.4153.666.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <54939.1229149205@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1229162907.4153.857.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1229167118.4153.930.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> <1229181896.3258.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1229208606.4153.1069.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On the other side however, the SCST guys are completely opposed to any > usage of ConfigFS [ ... ] It's sad to see that a few hours after James Bottomley asked to stop fighting, that you are again spreading half truths about Vladislav and myself. We are not opposed to any usage of configfs, but as Vladislav carefully explained, we consider it unfortunate that the current version of configfs doesn't suit SCST's needs. Bart.