From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: dm-multipath and write request ordering
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:22:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2e108260904130422k2ac92e64jb5aff1cc2adc8da0@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
Several people are using the dm-multipath software as follows:
* Linux server A is using dm-multipath to access data stored on
servers B and C via two iSCSI sessions -- one session between servers
A and B and one session between servers A and C.
* On servers B and C iSCSI target software exports a block device that
is replicated between servers B and C.
Round-robin load balancing will only work correctly in such a setup if
the replication software knows the order in which write requests have
been queued on the dm-multipath device. Since iSCSI uses the TCP/IP
protocol, write requests generated by server A can arrive out-of-order
on servers B and C. My questions are as follows:
- Is it correct that round-robin load balancing can only work
correctly in such a setup with proper support for write barriers in
the device mapper ?
- Did I understand it correctly that the current dm implementation
only supports barriers when remapping a single underlying device ?
- Are there any plans to add barrier support to dm-multipath ?
This is where I obtained my information about device mapper from:
[1] Jonathan Corbet, Multipath support in the device mapper, February
2005, http://lwn.net/Articles/124703/.
[2] Andi Kleen, [PATCH] Implement barrier support for single device DM
devices, February 2008, http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/15/125
[3] Stefan Bader, [2.6.23 PATCH 11/18] dm: disable barriers, July
2007, http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/11/432.
[4] dm source code,
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.29.y.git;a=tree;f=drivers/md;h=e0a3c2abb32bcec01c192217cda3f085e91217f3;hb=HEAD.
Bart.
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-13 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 11:22 Bart Van Assche [this message]
2009-04-14 7:16 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-14 8:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2009-04-16 15:38 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2e108260904130422k2ac92e64jb5aff1cc2adc8da0@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome