From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBDAC433EF for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 20:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346031AbiDNUDh (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:03:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346007AbiDNUDe (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Apr 2022 16:03:34 -0400 Received: from alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.38]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03133DCA9D; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=quicinc.com; i=@quicinc.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1649966467; x=1681502467; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6SG+3CsiHlJbOSDbfGJomT4dBWShXsbA04zZqqH4KoU=; b=Lls5U6Vf5k/0/Bq8DOUZGsrpgXQKiuDw3YBGoXXbf3qNz7K9zkeSXFSw gmBaBfChQaKT1K04x7zNPPkJsE7nlL/lzqa2Q+idPQqnZmKYaWX3iNIoL ie+9gl1m5v8/3Ey4lhk2/qZ2S2X/cdbER750gFw92+DcuF0sOfI084cTe o=; Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.143]) by alexa-out-sd-01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2022 13:01:06 -0700 X-QCInternal: smtphost Received: from nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.97.222]) by ironmsg03-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2022 13:01:05 -0700 Received: from nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) by nasanex01c.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.97.222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:01:04 -0700 Received: from [10.111.169.145] (10.80.80.8) by nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.22; Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:01:01 -0700 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:00:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2 Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH v7 0/4] Add support for the eDP panel over aux_bus Content-Language: en-US To: Stephen Boyd , Dmitry Baryshkov , Doug Anderson , Sankeerth Billakanti CC: quic_kalyant , , Bjorn Andersson , quic_vproddut , David Airlie , linux-arm-msm , LKML , dri-devel , Sean Paul , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , "Steev Klimaszewski" , Daniel Vetter , "Aravind Venkateswaran" , Kuogee Hsieh , freedreno References: <1649938766-6768-1-git-send-email-quic_sbillaka@quicinc.com> <20afcd97-4b8d-f770-151a-268b893b7c5a@linaro.org> From: Abhinav Kumar In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8] X-ClientProxiedBy: nasanex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.52.223.231) To nalasex01a.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.209.196) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Dmitry On 4/14/2022 12:43 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-04-14 12:20:31) >> On 14/04/2022 19:40, Doug Anderson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 5:19 AM Sankeerth Billakanti >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This series adds support for generic eDP panel over aux_bus. >>>> >>>> These changes are dependent on the following series: >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=613654&state=* >>> >>> You're basically depending on the last two patches of that series. >>> What's the plan there? In patchwork they're marked as "Not >>> Applicable". If they're good to go, maybe we should land them? If not, >>> maybe you should include them (with Dmitry as the author, of course) >>> at the beginning of your series? >> >> No, please do not resend patches. The patches in question are marked as >> 'Not applicable' as they are really not applicable to Bjorn's tree. >> It would be better to point to the correct patchwork: >> >> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/98585/ >> >> Note those patches still lack the R-B tag. I can include them anyway, >> basing on Sankeerth's Tested-by tag, but the formal R-B would also be good. >> > > Can you resend those as not RFC? Yes, please resend these, I can ack them. Previously I held off my ack, as kuogee ran into some issues testing them which was later concluded to be a mismatch in QC internal trees due to different versions of the changes.( another reason why we should get these landed ). Now, that Sankeerth has tested these, if you can remove RFC and post them, I can ack the. Thanks Abhinav