From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>, Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be] macros
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 10:02:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e32bd057-2069-63c9-b75d-3a97a736d898@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a2tL5wdCRscpyb6fW+LQVM05urud=YQRS-3+=4w53rmvg@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/06/17 04:11 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This is wrong since ioread* is not the same read* on x86 and other
> architectures that have native PCI PIO accessors, or that require
> additional barriers for those.
>
> You have to copy hi_lo_readq() here, and call ioread32 twice instead
> of calling readl() twice. Same for iowrite64.
>
>> +#ifndef ioread64be
>> +#define ioread64be(p) be64_to_cpu(ioread64(p))
>> +#endif
>
> This has another problem: ioread64() is defined to access little-endian
> registers, just like readq(). This means that instead of be64_to_cpu()
> you need swab64() and always perform the byte swap, otherwise this
> would be broken on big-endian architectures.
Ah, ok, understood. I'll see if I can fix both these issues.
Thanks,
Logan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-27 23:02 [PATCH v2 0/3] make io{read|write}64 more globally usable Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-27 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] io-64-nonatomic: add io{read|write}64[be] macros Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-28 10:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-28 16:02 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
2017-06-27 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ntb: ntb_hw_intel: use io-64-nonatomic instead of in-driver hacks Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-27 23:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] crypto: caam: cleanup CONFIG_64BIT ifdefs when using io{read|write}64 Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-28 10:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-06-28 16:51 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-06-29 7:52 ` Horia Geantă
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e32bd057-2069-63c9-b75d-3a97a736d898@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jsarha@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sbates@raithlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®