From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6200CC432C0 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD9521721 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 12:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726902AbfK2M4L (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 07:56:11 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:55414 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbfK2M4K (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2019 07:56:10 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C24F827C4B2A90F57078; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:56:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.133.217.137) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:56:01 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] part2: kill pr_warning from kernel To: Petr Mladek CC: , , , , , , References: <20191128004752.35268-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> <20191129115837.7hzuyqlmhbqsi4zm@pathway.suse.cz> From: Kefeng Wang Message-ID: Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 20:56:01 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191129115837.7hzuyqlmhbqsi4zm@pathway.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.133.217.137] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/11/29 19:58, Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2019-11-28 08:47:48, Kefeng Wang wrote: >> This is the part2 of kill pr_warning, as most pr_warning conversion merged >> into v5.5, let's cleanup the last two stragglers. Then, completely drop >> pr_warning defination in printk.h and check in checkpatch.pl. >> >> Part1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190920062544.180997-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com >> >> Kefeng Wang (4): >> workqueue: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning >> staging: isdn: gigaset: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning > > This one is already in mainline via staging tree. > >> printk: Drop pr_warning definition >> checkpatch: Drop pr_warning check > > The other patches are committed in printk.git, branch > for-5.5-pr-warning-removal. > > I am going to sent pull request after 5.5-rc1 is tagged. > It is should be fine according to linux-next. But I am not > sure if all coming changes are really tested in linux-next. > Hi Petr, thanks, the issue will always be there, so let's remove the definition ASAP, and we can fix the follow-up possible use :) > Best Regards, > Petr > > . >