From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
Justin Forbes <jforbes@redhat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] EFI mixed mode patch triggers boot failure
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:54:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e34311e8-fe39-3b65-bd6d-8f1594e56336@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161020120357.GB19876@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On 10/20/2016 05:03 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct, at 02:13:00PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> On 10/19/2016 01:04 PM, Laura Abbott wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Fedora received a bug report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384238
>>> of a bootup failure with stable 4.7.6. efi=noruntime fixed the bootup problem.
>>> 1297667083d5442aafe3e337b9413bf02b114edb was linked as the cause
>>> of the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> x86/efi: Only map RAM into EFI page tables if in mixed-mode
>>>
>>> Waiman reported that booting with CONFIG_EFI_MIXED enabled on his
>>> multi-terabyte HP machine results in boot crashes, because the EFI
>>> region mapping functions loop forever while trying to map those
>>> regions describing RAM.
>>>
>>> While this patch doesn't fix the underlying hang, there's really no
>>> reason to map EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY regions into the EFI page tables
>>> when mixed-mode is not in use at runtime.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
>>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>>> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>>> CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
>>> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>
>>> Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
>>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+
>>> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
>>>
>>> I made a request in the bugzilla for the reporter to
>>> give a bootlog with efi=debug which I'm still waiting on.
>>>
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Laura
>>
>> dmesg with efi=debug from the reporter is attached
>
>> [ 0.000000] DMI: Hewlett-Packard Compaq CQ58 Notebook PC/188B, BIOS F.36 06/07/2013
>
> Hmm.. this is a fairly old machine, what kernel versions has the
> reporter successfully run on it? The code that was nop'd out in the
> above commit for the native case only came into existence in v4.6.
>
> The fact that booting with efi=old_map does *not* seem to result in a
> booting kernel is very suspicious. Could you ask them to double-check?
>
> Maybe try this patch too on v4.7.6.
Was out for a few days, reporter says the below patch does not work.
There was some confusion with secure boot so I've asked them to re-test
with efi=old_map and secure boot off.
Thanks,
Laura
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 964c7022d31d..b07183c6b470 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -244,9 +244,12 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
> * text and allocate a new stack because we can't rely on the
> * stack pointer being < 4GB.
> */
> - if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED) || efi_is_native())
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED))
> return 0;
>
> + if (efi_is_native())
> + goto map_text;
> +
> /*
> * Map all of RAM so that we can access arguments in the 1:1
> * mapping when making EFI runtime calls.
> @@ -273,6 +276,7 @@ int __init efi_setup_page_tables(unsigned long pa_memmap, unsigned num_pages)
> efi_scratch.phys_stack = virt_to_phys(page_address(page));
> efi_scratch.phys_stack += PAGE_SIZE; /* stack grows down */
>
> +map_text:
> npages = (_etext - _text) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> text = __pa(_text);
> pfn = text >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-24 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-19 20:04 Laura Abbott
2016-10-19 21:13 ` Laura Abbott
2016-10-20 12:03 ` Matt Fleming
2016-10-24 19:54 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2017-01-27 22:34 ` Matt Fleming
2017-01-28 8:35 ` Laura Abbott
2017-01-30 13:10 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-02-01 17:35 ` Laura Abbott
2017-02-23 20:34 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-02-23 23:02 ` Laura Abbott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e34311e8-fe39-3b65-bd6d-8f1594e56336@redhat.com \
--to=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=jforbes@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®