mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: "Conor Dooley" <conor@kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, xiao.w.wang@intel.com,
	"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
	pulehui@huawei.com, "Charlie Jenkins" <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Samuel Holland" <samuel.holland@sifive.com>,
	"Pu Lehui" <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: clarify what some RISCV_ISA* config options do
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:08:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e34f73ce-bca8-4d18-84cd-9b8d0a6130b9@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529-riveter-spectacle-e5ab2f45065f@wendy>


On 29/05/2024 10:54, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:47:40AM +0200, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>> Hi Conor,
>>
>> On 28/05/2024 13:11, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>>
>>> During some discussion on IRC yesterday and on Pu's bpf patch [1]
>>> I noticed that these RISCV_ISA* Kconfig options are not really clear
>>> about their implications. Many of these options have no impact on what
>>> userspace is allowed to do, for example an application can use Zbb
>>> regardless of whether or not the kernel does. Change the help text to
>>> try and clarify whether or not an option affects just the kernel, or
>>> also userspace. None of these options actually control whether or not an
>>> extension is detected dynamically as that's done regardless of Kconfig
>>> options, so drop any text that implies the option is required for
>>> dynamic detection, rewording them as "do x when y is detected".
>>>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240328-ferocity-repose-c554f75a676c@spud/ [1]
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/riscv/Kconfig | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>    1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> index b94176e25be1..3b702e6cc051 100644
>>> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
>>> @@ -501,7 +501,8 @@ config RISCV_ISA_C
>>>    	help
>>>    	  Adds "C" to the ISA subsets that the toolchain is allowed to emit
>>>    	  when building Linux, which results in compressed instructions in the
>>> -	  Linux binary.
>>> +	  Linux binary. This option produces a kernel that will not run on
>>> +	  systems that do not support compressed instructions.
>>>    	  If you don't know what to do here, say Y.
>>> @@ -511,8 +512,8 @@ config RISCV_ISA_SVNAPOT
>>>    	depends on RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
>>>    	default y
>>>    	help
>>> -	  Allow kernel to detect the Svnapot ISA-extension dynamically at boot
>>> -	  time and enable its usage.
>>> +	  Add support for the Svnapot ISA-extension in the kernel when it
>>> +	  is detected at boot.
>>
>> To me, the new version makes things even more confusing: svnapot mappings
>> will indeed be handled by the kernel (since only the kernel sets up the page
>> tables) but it will only be used (for now) for HugeTLB mappings in
>> userspace.
> How would you suggest that I word it? "Enable the use of the Svnapot
> ISA-extension when it is detected at boot"? The current text implies that
> these options control detection of extensions (which they do not) and
> that is what I am looking to remove as it has caused confusion.


Ok, I see what you mean. Your above suggestion looks great then :)

Thanks,

Alex


>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-28 11:11 [PATCH v3 0/2] RISC-V: clarify what some RISCV_ISA* config options do & redo Zbb toolchain dependency Conor Dooley
2024-05-28 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] RISC-V: clarify what some RISCV_ISA* config options do Conor Dooley
2024-05-29  8:47   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2024-05-29  8:54     ` Conor Dooley
2024-05-29  9:08       ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2024-05-28 11:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] RISC-V: separate Zbb optimisations requiring and not requiring toolchain support Conor Dooley
2024-05-28 13:35   ` Andrew Jones
2024-05-29  1:01   ` Wang, Xiao W
2024-05-29  6:30     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e34f73ce-bca8-4d18-84cd-9b8d0a6130b9@ghiti.fr \
    --to=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huawei.com \
    --cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
    --cc=xiao.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®