From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
rafael@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, lenb@kernel.org,
zhenglifeng1@huawei.com, zhanjie9@hisilicon.com,
mario.limonciello@amd.com, saket.dumbre@intel.com,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev
Cc: treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, vsethi@nvidia.com,
ksitaraman@nvidia.com, sanjayc@nvidia.com, mochs@nvidia.com,
bbasu@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add ospm_nominal_perf support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 14:12:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3528e78-1397-439a-b8c2-22648d66efb5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260527194626.185286-3-sumitg@nvidia.com>
Hello Sumit,
On 5/27/26 21:46, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Expose the OSPM Nominal Performance register (ACPI 6.6, Section
> 8.4.6.1.2.6), which conveys the desired nominal performance level
> at which the platform may run. Unlike the existing read-only
> Nominal Performance register, it is writable and lets OSPM
> request a lower nominal level than the platform-reported nominal.
> The platform classifies performance above this level as boosted
> and below as throttled for its power/thermal decisions.
>
> It is exposed as a per-policy cpufreq sysfs attribute in kHz, to
> match the cpufreq sysfs unit convention:
>
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policyN/ospm_nominal_freq
>
> The attribute is documented in
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu.
>
> Writes are converted to perf via cppc_khz_to_perf(), validated
> against [Lowest Performance, Nominal Performance], and applied to
> every CPU in policy->cpus.
>
> The register is write-only; the kernel caches the last written
> value in struct cppc_cpudata for sysfs readback (returns 0 until
> userspace writes a value).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 17 ++++++
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 35 +++++++++++
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 12 ++++
> 4 files changed, 124 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> index 82d10d556cc8..ac1bf1b89ac4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu
> @@ -346,6 +346,23 @@ Description: Performance Limited
>
> This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is in use.
>
> +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cpufreq/ospm_nominal_freq
> +Date: May 2026
> +Contact: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> +Description: OSPM Nominal Performance (kHz)
> +
> + OSPM uses this attribute to request a nominal performance
> + level lower than the platform-reported nominal. The
> + platform treats performance above this level as boost
> + and below as throttle for power and thermal decisions.
> +
> + Read returns the last written value in kHz, or 0 if no
> + value has been written. Write a kHz value in the range
> + [lowest_freq, nominal_freq].
> +
> + This file is only present if the cppc-cpufreq driver is
> + in use.
> +
> What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cache/index3/cache_disable_{0,1}
> Date: August 2008
> KernelVersion: 2.6.27
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index c76cfafa3589..ad6ece16c30d 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -1682,6 +1682,41 @@ int cppc_set_epp(int cpu, u64 epp_val)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_epp);
>
> +/**
> + * cppc_set_ospm_nominal_perf() - Write OSPM Nominal Performance register.
> + * @cpu: CPU on which to write register.
> + * @ospm_nominal_perf: Value to write to the OSPM Nominal Performance register.
> + *
> + * OSPM Nominal Performance conveys the desired nominal performance level
> + * at which the platform may run. Per ACPI 6.6, s8.4.6.1.2.6, the value
> + * must lie within [Lowest Performance, Nominal Performance] and may be
> + * set independently of Minimum, Maximum and Desired performance.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success or negative error code.
> + */
> +int cppc_set_ospm_nominal_perf(int cpu, u64 ospm_nominal_perf)
> +{
> + struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu);
> + struct cppc_perf_caps caps;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!cpc_desc) {
> + pr_debug("No CPC descriptor for CPU:%d\n", cpu);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cppc_get_perf_caps(cpu, &caps);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (ospm_nominal_perf < caps.lowest_perf ||
> + ospm_nominal_perf > caps.nominal_perf)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return cppc_set_reg_val(cpu, OSPM_NOMINAL_PERF, ospm_nominal_perf);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_ospm_nominal_perf);
> +
> /**
> * cppc_get_auto_act_window() - Read autonomous activity window register.
> * @cpu: CPU from which to read register.
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 15a728dea911..5c54af1655b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -1139,11 +1139,70 @@ static int cppc_get_perf_limited_filtered(int cpu, u64 *perf_limited)
> CPPC_CPUFREQ_ATTR_RW_U64(perf_limited, cppc_get_perf_limited_filtered,
> cppc_set_perf_limited)
>
> +static ssize_t show_ospm_nominal_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
> + unsigned int freq_khz;
> +
> + if (!cpu_data->ospm_nominal_perf_set)
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0\n");
The questions on v3 might be more relevant,
but for instance here, the ospm_nominal_perf value is not 0,
the hardware register might contain any value.
So reading the register might be more meaningful than
returning 0.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-27 19:46 [PATCH v4 0/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add CPPC v4 support (ACPI 6.6) Sumit Gupta
2026-05-27 19:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add support for CPPC v4 Sumit Gupta
2026-06-01 17:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-01 18:01 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-06-01 18:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-27 19:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPI: CPPC: Add ospm_nominal_perf support Sumit Gupta
2026-05-28 12:12 ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2026-06-09 7:47 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-05-29 13:12 ` Christian Loehle
2026-06-09 7:37 ` Sumit Gupta
2026-06-01 17:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-06-09 9:59 ` Sumit Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3528e78-1397-439a-b8c2-22648d66efb5@arm.com \
--to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
--cc=acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=bbasu@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=ksitaraman@nvidia.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
--cc=sanjayc@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumitg@nvidia.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®