From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8042E4028E5; Tue, 19 May 2026 14:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779200819; cv=none; b=DxoS6Ie4gg53xOq1n+essl+GLXOsgNlcFwXuzg7lSfDErQYpMT1og5TFrmWuWjEKN1WnLlTdOY0I3XWkAkffS5QArolQkoGzfosgo3DV/I2JzzpFiddutb7fvt/oyyBABfZW6XPb2RY2HltGq5LAtsGp6MXm9iT2KLzoPyKWXNs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779200819; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KNxhon5ybps712VDZxjyzPyEqCwCCioxbZu8wnT0LWI=; h=From:Date:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WJNKuYV5SbNELbhVy2eenRtmz7O9XhbOxM/65/9Agx7difgnSCT9UnQINbBEHYF3xzbw7oBy+/uhZKxsE8MFFvk3/bcBK85z8p2O+g8+NhyYL3fe1LnySi8QeRJZoWkTvx1HgvYa/bpxorHUyBNEf5hoo27ubNfei0gA3coKpKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=evSffeG4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="evSffeG4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1779200817; x=1810736817; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-id; bh=KNxhon5ybps712VDZxjyzPyEqCwCCioxbZu8wnT0LWI=; b=evSffeG40uScER+4O6Ty4/qz5S39xM+Ix13DU8lamwa8kFnDDJ1/qGv9 nh7GP/5vcWqw1SXYlfEKpFbLCef1AHRpC/2XWYC+DnxHQk1TFE2KPkMCj 2Bg6aI1+CrYgAOu2fWqvcCy4qL6lJeCXmluGTGrZb+ilBYddgc50ca55D LYou44hQPUGJaViCF5UZ66jH1UAS2nDB7cWzL4N21MkR7m5J6l5kS2Z0m HOYHWIe0yiGGC+99pjcavUeA+mwoufbimRQQC+6JTn471/KoZ7nP93aVd AZhWw7O4alK70WWLMLGesqITl8N8eS3gpUkPWjnGXIllbdlPbeoAwp+MD w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: DJPKwToORlydQc/Y7Rt9YQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: K1SdeyXaT6u9ZVavTvH6Rg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11791"; a="83958362" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,243,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="83958362" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2026 07:26:47 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gAX0l7ifT2qiikpavcMM7Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oDCMzbM1Q+CRrS7xWmZQsA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,243,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="270120650" Received: from ijarvine-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.236]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2026 07:26:43 -0700 From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 17:26:39 +0300 (EEST) To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" cc: Hans de Goede , LKML , Linux ACPI , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Ho , Eric Piel , Alex Hung , Shravan Sudhakar , AceLan Kao Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() against NULL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <6007701.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-1173900426-1779200614=:1256" Content-ID: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1173900426-1779200614=:1256 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Content-ID: <25f704cf-a017-243f-c5fa-c9906733f529@linux.intel.com> On Tue, 19 May 2026, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Ilpo, >=20 > On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 5:17=E2=80=AFPM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > This series replaces > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/4731840.LvFx2qVVIh@rafael.j.wysocki/ > > > > and as a whole it makes exactly the same code changes. > > > > Every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't matc= h > > its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), so > > platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companio= n > > object need to verify its presence. > > > > Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks > > against NULL to 5 platform/x86 drivers where they are missing. > > > > Thanks! >=20 > I've noticed that you've picked up all of my patches except for this seri= es. >=20 > Has it been deferred on purpose or has it fallen through cracks? Somebody is a bit impatient... ;-) Nothing has fallen through the=20 cracks, I just cannot apply patches infinitely fast because I also do=20 take time to review them while applying... :-) ~/linux/platform-fixes$ b4 ty -l 2>&1 | grep -B1 'Rafael' 3: [PATCH v2 0/5] platform/x86: Check ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() a= gainst NULL From: Rafael J. Wysocki -- 4: [PATCH v1] platform/surface: surfacepro3_button: Check ACPI_COMPANION(= ) From: Rafael J. Wysocki --=20 i. --8323328-1173900426-1779200614=:1256--