Re: [PATCH 2/2] coresight: trbe: Allocate platform data per device

[Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>]

On 17/08/2023 11:16, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 8/17/23 15:31, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 17/08/2023 10:24, James Clark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/08/2023 07:37, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>> Hi Suzuki,
>>>>
>>>> Seems like this patch is going to conflict with the below proposed change
>>>>
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230817055405.249630-4-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know how should we resolve this conflict.
>>>
>>> We could merge them both, with the fixes: one first, just to acknowledge
>>> that there was a problem. But I suppose your one will have to be rebased
>>> on top.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/16/23 19:40, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>> Coresight TRBE driver shares a single platform data (which is empty btw).
>>>>> However, with the commit 4e8fe7e5c3a5
>>>>> ("coresight: Store pointers to connections rather than an array of them")
>>>>> the coresight core would free up the pdata, resulting in multiple attempts
>>>>> to free the same pdata for TRBE instances. Fix this by allocating a pdata per
>>>>> coresight_device.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 3fbf7f011f24 ("coresight: sink: Add TRBE driver")
>>>>
>>>> The above mentioned commit i.e 4e8fe7e5c3a5 seems to be a more recent one which
>>>> has triggered this problem. But would the problem be still there without that ?
>>>> Else 'Fixes:' tag would need changing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes I think the fixes tag should point to 4e8fe7e5c3a5.
>>
>> Agreed, I will change the fixes tag and push this.
> 
> In the first patch, the last hunk might not be required to fix the
> IPI problem and in fact might be bit problematic as well. Besides,

Please could you comment your concerns on the patch ?

Suzuki

> could you please hold off pushing this change into coresight tree
> for some time ?