From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <criu@lists.linux.dev>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@mihalicyn.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] x86/fpu: Extract restore_from_ia32_fxstate() and clean up fpu__restore_sig()
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:00:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3a39ad8-367e-4adb-805c-9fc6923769e0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908043427.1842515-4-avagin@google.com>
On 9/7/2026 9:34 PM, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> Improve readability of the signal frame restoration code. Previously,
Note the tip- changelog style:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-tip.htm
... A good structure is to explain the context, the problem and the
solution in separate paragraphs and this order. ...
This first sentence doesn't appear to be the context/problem itself.
> most of __fpu_restore_sig() was dedicated to handling the 32-bit compat
> fpstate, while the native direct path lived in restore_fpregs_from_user().
> Having the compat handling intermixed with the main flow made it tricky
> to quickly see what code was doing what.
>
> Extract the 32-bit legacy/compat FPU restore handling into a separate
> helper function, restore_from_ia32_fxstate(), and inline the remainder
> of __fpu_restore_sig() directly into fpu__restore_sig().
>
> The legacy 32-bit FP frame duplicates the FP state portion of the
> FX/XSAVE frame. For backward compatibility, the legacy FP frame is
> treated as the source of truth, and its state is folded into the
> FX/XSAVE state before restoring the registers.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander@mihalicyn.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@google.com>
...
> static inline unsigned int xstate_sigframe_size(struct fpstate *fpstate)
> {
> @@ -450,10 +449,11 @@ static inline unsigned int xstate_sigframe_size(struct fpstate *fpstate)
> bool fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, int ia32_frame)
> {
> struct fpu *fpu = x86_task_fpu(current);
> - void __user *buf_fx = buf;
> + bool success = false, fx_only = false;
> bool ia32_fxstate = false;
> - bool success = false;
> + void __user *buf_fx = buf;
> unsigned int size;
> + u64 xrestore_mask;
>
> if (unlikely(!buf)) {
> fpu__clear_user_states(fpu);
> @@ -482,10 +482,29 @@ bool fpu__restore_sig(void __user *buf, int ia32_frame)
> success = !fpregs_soft_set(current, NULL, 0,
> sizeof(struct user_i387_ia32_struct),
> NULL, buf);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (use_xsave()) {
> + struct _fpx_sw_bytes fx_sw_user;
> +
> + if (!check_xstate_in_sigframe(buf_fx, &fx_sw_user))
> + goto out;
> +
> + fx_only = !fx_sw_user.magic1;
> + xrestore_mask = fx_sw_user.xfeatures;
> } else {
> - success = __fpu_restore_sig(buf, buf_fx, ia32_fxstate);
> + xrestore_mask = XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE;
> + }
> +
> + if (ia32_fxstate) {
> + success = restore_from_ia32_fxstate(buf, buf_fx,
> + xrestore_mask, fx_only);
> + goto out;
> }
>
> + /* Restore the FPU registers directly from user memory. */
> + success = restore_fpregs_from_user(buf_fx, xrestore_mask, fx_only);
Nit: Just stylistic - maybe this could also be kept a bit simpler:
if (ia32_fxstate)
success = restore_from_ia32_fxstate();
else
success = restore_fpregs_from_user();
Overall, I think this refactoring makes the flow easier to follow with
smaller pieces:
Reviewed-by: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Thanks,
Chang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 4:34 [PATCH v5 0/7] x86/fpu: Restore and reinforce signal frame portability Andrei Vagin
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/fpu: Document signal frame layout and portability Andrei Vagin
2026-09-16 4:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86/fpu: Clean up and rename variables in signal frame handling Andrei Vagin
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86/fpu: Extract restore_from_ia32_fxstate() and clean up fpu__restore_sig() Andrei Vagin
2026-09-14 17:00 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86/fpu: Document reasoning of FX-only fallback Andrei Vagin
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/fpu: Fix potential underflow in xstate_calculate_size() Andrei Vagin
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/fpu: Pre-fault only required size of xstate buffer Andrei Vagin
2026-09-08 4:34 ` [PATCH 7/7] selftests/x86: Add tests for signal frame FPU portability Andrei Vagin
2026-09-14 17:03 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-09-14 17:05 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] x86/fpu: Restore and reinforce signal frame portability Chang S. Bae
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3a39ad8-367e-4adb-805c-9fc6923769e0@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=alexander@mihalicyn.com \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=criu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®