From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E0732B9AC; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 07:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768462315; cv=none; b=M4bmUJpnof3pPQfPvxjZTU+BLicIfvEP0eM+48oNwfKvdhbZ2o8adrok0gVTrEfxdMxztfew0YtxYmff7pSrW+CalHWs2ERUdM0e7kRQ+lXf4l77sA8amE5turBWn5WSmP0kpnCQZXutpwuL0ySEq/oaUAIaaz8KUNraeFZwQQM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768462315; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gCFxi3rBkIO5d81796YNR0A+M2D1y9GX8Cd3rDJphhg=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=epOzyErs+KSC8X0BLQdGezyF3mcrhGsGj9BG4wom90JGVDGem8TVgT4pxSk9V30ts96X2FQI7z3Lx5JQGq7XMwo9wucyzP4CtFO3uJ1KdDOM3/EynmmGDc6qoUFnKi9Zft136zzQeeisniK8yx4XPy/6NsoKKu1k7q3FiPeURSo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=JaKHEL8Y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.221 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="JaKHEL8Y" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=5dFnQyFRzBn2t4MUukpNZzTFF4PhWnExbW+AKUMLisU=; b=JaKHEL8Y/IPR1Cf5YY2IVD9M9zftKBScCC05h3tzuh3MwGU6pGQLT28Amtx5GcpkE3HCmUohI RbGAufGmnt94cmn62OUN3X7f70Lu/qkjC8ikMAXdmkpI6JOvgCLT6zZ/SGdVW3zSZpkHKSF78ns cbD/k58AX5v+7HaQIl1Q65w= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.223]) by canpmsgout06.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dsF2h1VLlzRhR3; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:28:28 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [10.3.19.32]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998A740539; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:31:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemq500010.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.235) by dggemv705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:31:48 +0800 Received: from [10.173.125.37] (10.173.125.37) by kwepemq500010.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.235) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:31:47 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm/memory-failure: fix missing ->mf_stats count in hugetlb poison To: Jane Chu CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , linux-kernel References: <20260114213721.2295844-1-jane.chu@oracle.com> From: Miaohe Lin Message-ID: Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 15:31:46 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20260114213721.2295844-1-jane.chu@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.17) To kwepemq500010.china.huawei.com (7.202.194.235) On 2026/1/15 5:37, Jane Chu wrote: > When a newly poisoned subpage ends up in an already poisoned hugetlb > folio, 'num_poisoned_pages' is incremented, but the per node ->mf_stats > is not. Fix the inconsistency by designating action_result() to update > them both. > > While at it, define __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison() return values in terms > of symbol names for better readibility. Also rename > folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison() to hugetlb_update_hwpoison() since the > function does more than the conventional bit setting and the fact > three possible return values are expected. > > Fixes: 18f41fa616ee4 ("mm: memory-failure: bump memory failure stats to pglist_data") > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Jane Chu > --- > v5 -> v4: > fix a bug pointed out by William and Chris, add comment. > v3 -> v4: > incorporate/adapt David's suggestions. > v2 -> v3: > No change. > v1 -> v2: > adapted David and Liam's comment, define __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison() > return values in terms of symbol names instead of naked integers for better > readibility. #define instead of enum is used since the function has footprint > outside MF, just try to limit the MF specifics local. > also renamed folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison() to hugetlb_update_hwpoison() > since the function does more than the conventional bit setting and the > fact three possible return values are expected. > > Signed-off-by: Jane Chu This patch looks good to me. A few nits below. > --- > mm/memory-failure.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- > 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c > index fbc5a01260c8..2563718c34c6 100644 > --- a/mm/memory-failure.c > +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c > @@ -1883,12 +1883,24 @@ static unsigned long __folio_free_raw_hwp(struct folio *folio, bool move_flag) > return count; > } > > -static int folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page) > +#define MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED 3 /* folio already poisoned */ > +#define MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED 4 /* exact page already poisoned */ > +/* > + * Set hugetlb folio as hwpoisoned, update folio private raw hwpoison list > + * to keep track of the poisoned pages. > + * Return: > + * 0: folio was not already poisoned; > + * MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED: folio was already poisoned: either > + * multiple pages being poisoned, or per page information unclear, > + * MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED: folio was already poisoned, an exact > + * poisoned page is being consumed again. > + */ > +static int hugetlb_update_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page) > { > struct llist_head *head; > struct raw_hwp_page *raw_hwp; > struct raw_hwp_page *p; > - int ret = folio_test_set_hwpoison(folio) ? -EHWPOISON : 0; > + int ret = folio_test_set_hwpoison(folio) ? MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED : 0; > > /* > * Once the hwpoison hugepage has lost reliable raw error info, > @@ -1896,20 +1908,17 @@ static int folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio, struct page *page) > * so skip to add additional raw error info. > */ > if (folio_test_hugetlb_raw_hwp_unreliable(folio)) > - return -EHWPOISON; > + return MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED; > head = raw_hwp_list_head(folio); > llist_for_each_entry(p, head->first, node) { > if (p->page == page) > - return -EHWPOISON; > + return MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED; > } > > raw_hwp = kmalloc(sizeof(struct raw_hwp_page), GFP_ATOMIC); > if (raw_hwp) { > raw_hwp->page = page; > llist_add(&raw_hwp->node, head); > - /* the first error event will be counted in action_result(). */ > - if (ret) > - num_poisoned_pages_inc(page_to_pfn(page)); > } else { > /* > * Failed to save raw error info. We no longer trace all > @@ -1955,44 +1964,43 @@ void folio_clear_hugetlb_hwpoison(struct folio *folio) > folio_free_raw_hwp(folio, true); > } > > +#define MF_HUGETLB_FREED 0 /* freed hugepage */ > +#define MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED 1 /* in-use hugepage */ It might be better to define all of them together. e.g. #define MF_HUGETLB_FREED 0 /* freed hugepage */ #define MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED 1 /* in-use hugepage */ #define MF_HUGETLB_NON_HUGEPAGE 2 /* not a hugepage */ #define MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED 3 /* folio already poisoned */ #define MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED 4 /* exact page already poisoned */ #define MF_HUGETLB_RETRY 5 /* the hugepage is busy (try to retry) */ > /* > * Called from hugetlb code with hugetlb_lock held. > - * > - * Return values: > - * 0 - free hugepage > - * 1 - in-use hugepage > - * 2 - not a hugepage > - * -EBUSY - the hugepage is busy (try to retry) > - * -EHWPOISON - the hugepage is already hwpoisoned > */ > int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags, > bool *migratable_cleared) > { > struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > struct folio *folio = page_folio(page); > - int ret = 2; /* fallback to normal page handling */ > + int ret = -EINVAL; > bool count_increased = false; > + int rc; > > if (!folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) > goto out; > > if (flags & MF_COUNT_INCREASED) { > - ret = 1; > + ret = MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED; > count_increased = true; > } else if (folio_test_hugetlb_freed(folio)) { > - ret = 0; > + ret = MF_HUGETLB_FREED; > } else if (folio_test_hugetlb_migratable(folio)) { > - ret = folio_try_get(folio); > - if (ret) > + if (folio_try_get(folio)) { > + ret = MF_HUGETLB_IN_USED; > count_increased = true; > + } else > + ret = MF_HUGETLB_FREED; > } else { > ret = -EBUSY; > if (!(flags & MF_NO_RETRY)) > goto out; > } > > - if (folio_set_hugetlb_hwpoison(folio, page)) { > - ret = -EHWPOISON; > + rc = hugetlb_update_hwpoison(folio, page); > + if (rc >= MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED) { > + ret = rc; > goto out; > } > > @@ -2017,10 +2025,15 @@ int __get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(unsigned long pfn, int flags, > * with basic operations like hugepage allocation/free/demotion. > * So some of prechecks for hwpoison (pinning, and testing/setting > * PageHWPoison) should be done in single hugetlb_lock range. > + * Returns: > + * 0 - not hugetlb, or recovered > + * -EBUSY - not recovered > + * -EOPNOTSUPP - hwpoison_filter'ed > + * -EHWPOISON - folio or exact page already poisoned > */ > static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb) > { > - int res; > + int res, rv; > struct page *p = pfn_to_page(pfn); > struct folio *folio; > unsigned long page_flags; > @@ -2029,22 +2042,30 @@ static int try_memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags, int *hugetlb > *hugetlb = 1; > retry: > res = get_huge_page_for_hwpoison(pfn, flags, &migratable_cleared); > - if (res == 2) { /* fallback to normal page handling */ > + switch (res) { > + case -EINVAL: /* fallback to normal page handling */ > *hugetlb = 0; > return 0; > - } else if (res == -EHWPOISON) { > - if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) { > - folio = page_folio(p); > - res = kill_accessing_process(current, folio_pfn(folio), flags); > - } > - action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED, MF_FAILED); > - return res; > - } else if (res == -EBUSY) { > + case -EBUSY: > if (!(flags & MF_NO_RETRY)) { > flags |= MF_NO_RETRY; > goto retry; > } > return action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_GET_HWPOISON, MF_IGNORED); > + case MF_HUGETLB_FOLIO_PRE_POISONED: > + case MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED: > + rv = -EHWPOISON; > + if (flags & MF_ACTION_REQUIRED) { > + folio = page_folio(p); > + rv = kill_accessing_process(current, folio_pfn(folio), flags); > + } > + if (res == MF_HUGETLB_PAGE_PRE_POISONED) > + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_ALREADY_POISONED, MF_FAILED); > + else > + action_result(pfn, MF_MSG_HUGE, MF_FAILED); > + return rv; > + default: Should we add a warn here? Thanks. .