mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Guixiong Wei <weiguixiong@bytedance.com>, <x86@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Free dynamic fpstate on exec()
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:50:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3cba491-9fdb-4907-9843-c427c96c3237@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929151013.81562-2-weiguixiong@bytedance.com>

On 9/29/2026 8:10 AM, Guixiong Wei wrote:
> The fpstate embedded in struct fpu only accommodates the default
> xfeatures. When a task first uses a dynamically enabled xfeature,
> fpstate_realloc() installs a larger fpstate allocated with vzalloc().
> 
> fpu_flush_thread() resets fpu->fpstate to the embedded fpstate on exec()
> without freeing the dynamically allocated one. Once the pointer is
> overwritten, arch_release_task_struct() cannot free the allocation when
> the task exits.

Thanks for the finding and fixing this. I see Dave has given good 
suggestions. I think you can follow those into a revision.

...

> On an AMX-capable system, 1000 iterations of requesting XTILEDATA
> permission, executing TILEZERO and calling execve() on the same image
> left 1000 16 KiB allocations attributed to __xfd_enable_feature() in
> /proc/vmallocinfo. None remained after this change.

I would be interested in turning this into a selftest if possible. It 
would be great if you could.

Otherwise, I wrote a case (using XRSTOR instead) and then saw that 
amount from fpstate_relloac() in vmallocinfo:

   Caller/Module                            Difference
   ---------------------------------------------------
   fpstate_realloc.constprop.0 (pages=3)    +16384000
   ...

BTW, just curious if it happens with real-world applications. The 
permission is revoked on exec(), that is a very edge of the TMUL use if 
so. Is it a case running another application right after matrix 
multiplications?

Thanks,
Chang

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30  6:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29 15:10 Guixiong Wei
2026-09-29 15:57 ` Dave Hansen
2026-09-29 16:53 ` Dave Hansen
2026-09-30  8:58   ` 魏桂雄
2026-09-30  6:50 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2026-09-30  9:44   ` Guixiong Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3cba491-9fdb-4907-9843-c427c96c3237@intel.com \
    --to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=weiguixiong@bytedance.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®