From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
To: chitranshmandhaniya@gmail.com, hansg@kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: dell-wmi-ddv: switch sensor mutex to devm_mutex_init()
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 18:07:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3d30656-0040-4993-a3cc-fac474909cf7@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261027044819.75761-1-chitranshmandhaniya@gmail.com>
Am 27.10.26 um 05:48 schrieb chitranshmandhaniya@gmail.com:
> From: Chitransh Mandhaniya <Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com>
>
> Replace mutex_init() with devm_mutex_init() for the sensor caching
> mutex so the mutex lifecycle is managed by devres. This allows
> removing the manual mutex_destroy() call from the
> dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_cache_destroy() cleanup callback.
>
> The translation_cache_lock in the same driver already uses
> devm_mutex_init(); this brings the sensor lock in line.
Hi,
thanks for the patch, but now sensors->lock will remain initialized
even when dell_wmi_ddv_channel_create() fails. To be honest i do not
think that using devm_mutex_init() makes much sense here, because the
lifetime of the sensor cache can end before the device lifetime (if
dell_wmi_ddv_channel_create() returns an error).
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
> Signed-off-by: Chitransh Mandhaniya <Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c
> index f8903ced461b..c7f3d07abbc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-ddv.c
> @@ -548,7 +548,6 @@ static void dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_cache_destroy(void *data)
> struct dell_wmi_ddv_sensors *sensors = data;
>
> sensors->active = false;
> - mutex_destroy(&sensors->lock);
> kfree(sensors->buffer);
> }
>
> @@ -566,7 +565,9 @@ static struct hwmon_channel_info *dell_wmi_ddv_channel_init(struct wmi_device *w
> if (ret < 0)
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>
> - mutex_init(&sensors->lock);
> + ret = devm_mutex_init(&wdev->dev, &sensors->lock);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> sensors->active = true;
>
> ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&wdev->dev, dell_wmi_ddv_hwmon_cache_destroy, sensors);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-01 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 4:48 chitranshmandhaniya
2026-11-01 17:07 ` Armin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e3d30656-0040-4993-a3cc-fac474909cf7@gmx.de \
--to=w_armin@gmx.de \
--cc=Chitransh_Mandhaniya@dell.com \
--cc=chitranshmandhaniya@gmail.com \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®