Re: [PATCH V4 1/2] mm: add defines for min/max swappiness

[Huan Yang <11133793@vivo.com>]

在 2023/12/14 0:41, Dan Schatzberg 写道:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from schatzberg.dan@gmail.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:58:26AM +0800, Huan Yang wrote:
>> 在 2023/12/13 9:38, Dan Schatzberg 写道:
>>> [????????? schatzberg.dan@gmail.com ????????? https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification,????????????]
>>>
>>> We use the constants 0 and 200 in a few places in the mm code when
>>> referring to the min and max swappiness. This patch adds MIN_SWAPPINESS
>>> and MAX_SWAPPINESS #defines to improve clarity. There are no functional
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>    include/linux/swap.h |  2 ++
>>>    mm/memcontrol.c      |  2 +-
>>>    mm/vmscan.c          | 10 +++++-----
>>>    3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
>>> index f6dd6575b905..e2ab76c25b4a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/swap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/swap.h
>>> @@ -407,6 +407,8 @@ extern unsigned long try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist, int order,
>>>
>>>    #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_MAY_SWAP (1 << 1)
>>>    #define MEMCG_RECLAIM_PROACTIVE (1 << 2)
>>> +#define MIN_SWAPPINESS 0
>>> +#define MAX_SWAPPINESS 200
>> Do MAX_SWAPPINESS apply for all swapppiness? If so, maybe better change
>> swappiness sysctl define:
>> ```
>> sysctl.c:
>>
>> {
>>          .procname    = "swappiness",
>>          .data        = &vm_swappiness,
>>          .maxlen        = sizeof(vm_swappiness),
>>          .mode        = 0644,
>>          .proc_handler    = proc_dointvec_minmax,
>>          .extra1        = SYSCTL_ZERO,
>>          .extra2        = SYSCTL_TWO_HUNDRED,
>>      },
>>
>> ```
>>
>> Here hard code swappiness in [0, 200], and now add a new define.
> Yes, MAX_SWAPPINESS is a hard limit. I'm not sure what you're
> proposing here - the SYSCTL_ZERO and SYSCTL_TWO_HUNDRED values are a
I mean, MAX_SWAPPINESS and SYSCTL_TWO_HUNDRED  all limit swappiness,
but  are different definitions.

If swappiness change 200 into 400, you need to change here extra2 and your
MAX_SWAPPINESS. It's wierd.
> little different than the defines I added. I think most of the value
> is just consistently using the defines in the core mm code.
>
>> And many other code hard reference 200 into max value of swappiness, like:
>>
>> ```
>> memcontrol.c:
>> static int mem_cgroup_swappiness_write(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
>>                         struct cftype *cft, u64 val)
>> {
>>      struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
>>
>>      if (val > 200)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>
>>      if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
>>          memcg->swappiness = val;
>>      else
>>          vm_swappiness = val;
>>
>>      return 0;
>> }
> This one is already fixed in my patch.