mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Jihed Chaibi <jihed.chaibi.dev@gmail.com>
Cc: olivier.moysan@foss.st.com, arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: stm32: Fix incorrect compatible string in stm32h7-sai match
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 13:47:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4146fbd-3e2e-4d2f-b042-2af006bdfefb@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260321012011.125791-1-jihed.chaibi.dev@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 493 bytes --]

On Sat, Mar 21, 2026 at 02:20:11AM +0100, Jihed Chaibi wrote:
> The conditional block that defines clock constraints for the stm32h7-sai
> variant references "st,stm32mph7-sai", which does not match any compatible
> string in the enum. As a result, clock validation for the h7 variant is
> silently skipped. Correct the compatible string to "st,stm32h7-sai".

A web search for stm32mph7 appears to show stm32h7 as the correct part
number...  ST people, any confirmation here?  Are both valid?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-23 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-21  1:20 Jihed Chaibi
2026-03-23 13:47 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-03-24 12:49   ` Olivier MOYSAN
2026-03-24 12:54 ` Olivier MOYSAN
2026-03-24 12:58 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4146fbd-3e2e-4d2f-b042-2af006bdfefb@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jihed.chaibi.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=olivier.moysan@foss.st.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®