From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>, Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
george.ge@microchip.com, kelvin.cao@microchip.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: switchtec-dma: Fix device reference leak in switchtec_dma_create()
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:53:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e45646cf-0779-4be3-986b-48a5c12557f7@deltatee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqq-SldWxcGqF1Ay@SMW015318>
On 2026-09-16 10:05, Frank Li wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 09:33:32AM +0000, Wentao Liang wrote:
>> switchtec_dma_create() takes a reference on the PCI device with
>> get_device() and stores it in dma->dev. The reference is normally
>> dropped by switchtec_dma_release(), the device_release() callback,
>> which only runs after a successful dma_async_device_register(). If
>> the registration fails, the code frees the dma device directly from
>> the err_chans_release_exit label without ever dropping that extra
>> reference, leaking the reference taken on the PCI device.
>>
>> Drop the reference with put_device() on the error path.
>>
>> Fixes: d9587042b50f ("dmaengine: switchtec-dma: Introduce Switchtec DMA engine skeleton")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
>> index 3ef928640615..b07bdd0ac540 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/switchtec_dma.c
>> @@ -1297,6 +1297,7 @@ static int switchtec_dma_create(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>
>> err_chans_release_exit:
>> switchtec_dma_chans_release(pdev, swdma_dev);
>> + put_device(dma->dev);
>
> Does switchtec_dma_remove() also need put_device()?
No, the release already happens in switchtec_dma_release() after the
device is removed. It can't be done in swtichtec_dma_remove() or it will
be potentially used if the device still exists after
switchtec_dma_remove() completes.
The patch looks correct to me but it will conflict with the patches in
my series waiting for merging:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260902062153.31048-1-logang@deltatee.com/T/#u
I'd appreciate it if my series could go in first and this gets rebased
on top of it.
Other than that:
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Thanks!
Logan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-16 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 9:33 Wentao Liang
2026-09-16 16:05 ` Frank Li
2026-09-16 17:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e45646cf-0779-4be3-986b-48a5c12557f7@deltatee.com \
--to=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=george.ge@microchip.com \
--cc=kelvin.cao@microchip.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®