mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com,
	vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: rename variable cpu_util eff_util
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:58:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4672cee-6bec-d20e-bfcf-f701fc6a45c6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230611122535.183654-1-trix@redhat.com>

On 11/06/2023 14:25, Tom Rix wrote:
> cppcheck reports
> kernel/sched/fair.c:7436:17: style: Local variable 'cpu_util' shadows outer function [shadowFunction]
>   unsigned long cpu_util;
>                 ^
> 
> Clean this up by renaming the variable to eff_util
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 6189d1a45635..7666dbc2b788 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -7433,7 +7433,7 @@ eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
>  	for_each_cpu(cpu, pd_cpus) {
>  		struct task_struct *tsk = (cpu == dst_cpu) ? p : NULL;
>  		unsigned long util = cpu_util(cpu, p, dst_cpu, 1);
> -		unsigned long cpu_util;
> +		unsigned long eff_util;
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Performance domain frequency: utilization clamping
> @@ -7442,8 +7442,8 @@ eenv_pd_max_util(struct energy_env *eenv, struct cpumask *pd_cpus,
>  		 * NOTE: in case RT tasks are running, by default the
>  		 * FREQUENCY_UTIL's utilization can be max OPP.
>  		 */
> -		cpu_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, FREQUENCY_UTIL, tsk);
> -		max_util = max(max_util, cpu_util);
> +		eff_util = effective_cpu_util(cpu, util, FREQUENCY_UTIL, tsk);
> +		max_util = max(max_util, eff_util);
>  	}
>  
>  	return min(max_util, eenv->cpu_cap);

I forgot to check this in patch 'sched/fair: Refactor CPU utilization
functions' when I replaced cpu_util_next() with cpu_util().

Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-12 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-11 12:25 Tom Rix
2023-06-12 15:44 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-06-12 15:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2023-06-15 11:38 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Rename " tip-bot2 for Tom Rix
2023-06-16 15:16 ` tip-bot2 for Tom Rix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4672cee-6bec-d20e-bfcf-f701fc6a45c6@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®