From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=211.75.126.72 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794110928; b=02i/oaCIrCyhbOGGjoj43+fdNH5yA3ZjeYUWKTp6SRbkDzyGJ3EfJQNR00rN3RavIGho MsgnCG/uZhJaooaqLyuo56wm6ih2fei4hELxpP/cx7XFpabkBGfNgIdorwTQfO9Qde5RX 52mwJZk/uJwJbN4m/oOMhXKqCterCf70kuNAhj8GrqstVvbZoXlgCjzAw193LQM0SleXC b3JVIZMYslD0BHx+OkAVG/5N4nTekwWL+WlSVdv8NhyB/aAYApAYuwadY6gqucfeOE0KQ SaXepFuAfSrPpZM/tuQ90HiDOycJdA0hvhx4Y+oBoqXf/O2q4ahOjkTT/BXNBb8/EkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794110928; h=DMARC-Filter:X-SpamFilter-By:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received: Received:From:To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: x-originating-ip:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=NxlUTHwu8MZSvIAGRZNdmcVny8DSWeBIW0pG2xSdH/M=; b=KnqYBtBIYvqZLf2t8Z4RHdO2oOAt6HtWbBYob7Qz0eEZ+seXeEfXs3s9tRLiJ4kBMr+U L3zm/3uw2Edo/kfxzYdLu1ql0QOAoDvO/R245xWCzFWhtt6KwkOQgf4oqEC3tGMYulSxA gHEzOOsSzddBH13MTggmIpfZ9FppKZ/tVQ0lamKz+Yv+hpCnP3pSLpLzAcO14tCTr+blR O3dn0MTBVk9Nr7RvfAxsFk/MEewFg2xuAGMww7RkhkKwubabttamCsIWe/HWbjgd2WDZz WWdYDUOGan1xkQHW0H3yW6bSecUah8WsFbwGa4AF1jHLQU2H/l8Vfj+wNAklx0SJ31Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=realtek.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com; dkim=pass header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=WCSSszSf; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=211.75.126.72 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD04606A31A; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 04:08:46 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 4FD04606A31A Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=realtek.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=realtek.com header.i=@realtek.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim header.b=WCSSszSf X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.80 with qID 6A848gQeA3127841, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=realtek.com; s=dkim; t=1794110922; bh=NxlUTHwu8MZSvIAGRZNdmcVny8DSWeBIW0pG2xSdH/M=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=WCSSszSf9OWmRBFFKveK992Y0FIzaBzyleeUPv/ttV8+whyRQ7ShHy2zmSoG0La8v ojaa9tV2WaNziSNApcaYoPkpXc4UtxE8HQD5xxUm7B6g4hQRBIwy9sihRaFoY8p9C3 8OEJgcSRJZ1wceQm7haIAfxwJ1IAinubeVIXDxhCYM9NOp3eJByZPAjBBJtGIvBuwG 3+jJ6u+sCOd8PeM1OLJqz1l+G2cTSyfj9ZN/2vC0TIOv2yNEMzRyRDokYkzxusj03J gB6uUirE7iEPtc3zTNAWU0knFe6JH+MKy8YS4u9Y1DNzZvEHmEMGlhxKqUNWzbKhZ1 keGoZEm2Qrjcg== Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtkexhmbs03.realtek.com.tw[10.21.1.53]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/3.29/5.94) with ESMTPS id 6A848gQeA3127841 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 8 Nov 2026 12:08:42 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.56) by RTKEXHMBS03.realtek.com.tw (10.21.1.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.56; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 12:08:43 +0800 Received: from RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::eeeb:c765:ca73:5eef]) by RTKEXHMBS06.realtek.com.tw ([fe80::eeeb:c765:ca73:5eef%10]) with mapi id 15.02.2562.056; Sun, 8 Nov 2026 12:08:43 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: Ho Jie Feng , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" CC: Bitterblue Smith , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH rtw-next 1/5] wifi: rtlwifi: rc: start no BA session for QoS null frames Thread-Topic: [PATCH rtw-next 1/5] wifi: rtlwifi: rc: start no BA session for QoS null frames Thread-Index: AQHda3lHxIC7vpFqd0S6iIDQsoFki7cjlhkA Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2026 04:08:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20261103095256.949327-1-hjf3108@gmail.com> <20261103095256.949327-2-hjf3108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20261103095256.949327-2-hjf3108@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW Content-Language: zh-TW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Ho Jie Feng wrote: > Only start BA sessions for frames that carry data. I can't understand why building a BA session for null frames cause lower throughput? Please explain why. >=20 > Test results (2.4 GHz): > before after > TX 7.0 6.1 > RX 28.3 29.1 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ho Jie Feng