From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403AEC07E9B for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234EB61009 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 22:08:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230367AbhGTV2G (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:28:06 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:54531 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230123AbhGTV0l (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:26:41 -0400 Received: from ip6-localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 16KM2gSN032638; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 17:02:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwrng: Add Arm SMCCC TRNG based driver From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Andre Przywara , Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Matt Mackall , Herbert Xu , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mark Brown , Will Deacon , Ali Saidi , Jon Nettleton Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 08:02:42 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20210720171631.071f84f5@slackpad.fritz.box> References: <20210720152158.31804-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20210720171631.071f84f5@slackpad.fritz.box> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2021-07-20 at 17:16 +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: > Yes, a similar idea was already brought up before. I think there is even > the potential for something like an artificial SMCCC "bus", where those > services presentable as devices could be auto-detected (by checking > known function IDs), the respective drivers would then probe > automatically? Sounds like a boot time killer... can we instead describe them in DT and/or ACPI ? Cheers, Ben.