From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E792AC433F4 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979E12174E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 01:09:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 979E12174E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727081AbeH0EyE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:54:04 -0400 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:11606 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726825AbeH0EyE (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:54:04 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5239296697043; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:09:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.63.173.108) by DGGEMS414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.214) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:09:34 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH NET 3/3] net: hns: add configuration constraints for 1000M half To: Andrew Lunn CC: , , , , , References: <1535082143-122281-1-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com> <1535082143-122281-4-git-send-email-lipeng321@huawei.com> <20180824034119.GA29111@lunn.ch> <194ac663-94d8-55e2-0231-a6be53e35f04@huawei.com> <20180824132857.GA1999@lunn.ch> <7c40c758-2ef2-665d-f429-0cc4e63a7a38@huawei.com> <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch> From: "lipeng (Y)" Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 09:08:45 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180825180721.GB23992@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.63.173.108] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/8/26 2:07, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> This patch is a  theoretical protect, and the problem does not really >> happen. >> >> I think you really get the point, do you think we need this patch? > I think it is not needed. > > And if it was needed, it would indicate there is a bug somewhere else. Hi, Andrew It is a theoretical protect,we can remove  this patch from patchset. Thanks. > > Andrew > > . >