From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC88BC6778A for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E581253D5 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 12:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="w67KkN6c" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E581253D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752073AbeGBMJs (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:09:48 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:46428 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932944AbeGBMJi (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jul 2018 08:09:38 -0400 Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w62C8VwA068286; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:08:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1530533311; bh=tygW0TW0FOu3iHSlexpm+CLFV/TQRP5bxqTXwMAdO3g=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=w67KkN6cv2lDJhQXnBk+F93V+lzVhgi6Ylb3Xail03WigncMKFkBRk+GLYXG5YDgP HhI/s2k81Wl6+rwSZ6nNmk7uGFKpu7NBYuFPxqWJp9QcbZSNFZfFXUfMOsjt8WmF5M 6yECYF5g86hFrHOASWYE6vjE2V7nfdFLw00OloIQ= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w62C8VP0008478; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:08:31 -0500 Received: from DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1466.3; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:08:31 -0500 Received: from dlep33.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.75) by DLEE101.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1466.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:08:31 -0500 Received: from [172.24.190.172] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep33.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w62C8OGI027697; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:08:25 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework To: Bjorn Andersson CC: Bartosz Golaszewski , Kevin Hilman , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , David Lechner , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Linux ARM , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk , , Bartosz Golaszewski References: <20180621073706.22812-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <9ec10627-49a5-07ad-8c9d-5ac873096cc0@ti.com> From: Sekhar Nori Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:38:24 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On Thursday 21 June 2018 05:11 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-06-21 12:52 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori : >> Hi Bartosz, >> >> On Thursday 21 June 2018 01:07 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> >>> These are the remaining patches that still need to be merged in order >>> to complete the conversion of the davinci dsp driver to using the reset >>> framework. >>> >>> They apply on top of v4.18-rc1 with David Lechner's remaining patches >>> merged. >> >> Series looks good to me. >> >> To preserve bisect, shouldn't the order of applying be patch #3, #4, #1 >> and #2 ? >> >> Given the dependencies and to preserve bisect its easiest if I take the >> series with acks from remoteproc and clock maintainers. >> >> Open to other suggestions as well. >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar > > Oops you're right about the order. Do you want me to resend? With your ack, I can queue 1/4 for v4.19 and provide an immutable commit to you (on top of v4.18-rc1) for you to merge any further changes you want to queue from your tree. Bartosz, given the number of moving pieces, I think its better to keep 2/4 for v4.20 release - once all other other dependencies have been merged. Thanks, Sekhar