From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: bingfangguo@tencent.com
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, Bingfang Guo <bfguo@icloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] memcg: move memcg private ID refcount to objcg
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2026 11:32:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4ec1370-27cf-40db-ba4e-b46fe54fa882@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918-bingfangguo-memcgid-rework-v1-4-5bbf3220d88f@tencent.com>
On 2026/9/18 17:18, Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Bingfang Guo <bingfangguo@tencent.com>
>
> The memcg private ID is used by objects that can't afford storing a
> whole pointer and can outlive memcgs to track the memcg (notably swap
> entries). The current design holds a refcount to the css, preventing the
> memcg from being freed.
>
> This patch unbinds the lifetime of memcgid from the memcg so it can be
> freed. The idea is to move the refcount of memcgid to one of the
> memcg's objcg. The objcg is stored in the global memcgid xarray instead
> and used for retrieving the online memcg from it. So swapped out pages
> no longer pin the dying memcg.
>
> After the change, a memcgid can refer to a non present memcg. To handle
> this situation, when trying to get the original memcg from the id,
> compare the memcgid passed in with that of the memcg, and return NULL to
> indicate its death if they differ. NULL checks are added for
> list_lru_walk_node(), workingset_test_recent() and lru_gen_test_recent()
> to skip dead memcgs.
>
> In the earlier patch, an extra xarray lookup was introduced in swap
> uncharging path. Now that we have the objcg pointer in the function,
> the extra overhead can be removed by using it for putting directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bingfang Guo <bingfangguo@tencent.com>
> ---
> include/linux/memcontrol.h | 9 +++---
> mm/list_lru.c | 2 +-
> mm/memcontrol.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> mm/workingset.c | 5 ++-
> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 46bf724cae7af..3fb18191cfbd1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ struct obj_cgroup {
> struct percpu_ref refcnt;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> atomic_t nr_charged_bytes;
> + refcount_t private_id_ref;
> union {
> struct list_head list; /* protected by objcg_lock */
> struct rcu_head rcu;
> @@ -225,9 +226,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> /* vmpressure notifications. Written on every reclaim iteration. */
> struct vmpressure vmpressure;
>
> - /* Written on every swap charge and uncharge. */
> - refcount_t private_id_ref;
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_NMI_SAFETY_REQUIRES_ATOMIC
> /* MEMCG_KMEM for nmi context */
> atomic_t kmem_stat;
> @@ -324,8 +322,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> unsigned long zswap_max;
> #endif
>
> + /* The objcg holding private memcg ID. */
> + struct obj_cgroup *private_id_objcg;
> +
> /* Private memcg ID. Used to ID objects that outlive the cgroup */
> - int private_id;
> + unsigned short private_id;
>
> int kmemcg_id;
>
> diff --git a/mm/list_lru.c b/mm/list_lru.c
> index 8a6dd0a489e12..7edd79113cc56 100644
> --- a/mm/list_lru.c
> +++ b/mm/list_lru.c
> @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
> xa_for_each(&lru->xa, index, mlru) {
> rcu_read_lock();
> memcg = mem_cgroup_from_private_id(index);
> - if (!mem_cgroup_tryget(memcg)) {
> + if (!memcg || !mem_cgroup_tryget(memcg)) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> continue;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index ed44b3e7ac938..22deee8312856 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -4074,6 +4074,18 @@ static void memcg_wb_domain_size_changed(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> #define MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX ((1UL << MEM_CGROUP_ID_SHIFT) - 1)
> static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC1(mem_cgroup_private_ids);
>
> +/**
> + * obj_cgroup_from_private_id - look up the objcg holding the memcg id.
> + * @id: the memcg id to look up
> + *
> + * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock().
This comment is really redundant since you already include a lockdep
assertion. My advice for writing good comments: when the code is
self-explanatory, explain why rather than what.
> + */
> +static inline struct obj_cgroup *obj_cgroup_from_private_id(unsigned short id)
> +{
> + lockdep_assert_once(rcu_read_lock_held());
> + return xa_load(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, id);
> +}
> +
> static void mem_cgroup_private_id_remove(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> if (memcg->private_id > 0) {
> @@ -4082,34 +4094,43 @@ static void mem_cgroup_private_id_remove(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> }
> }
>
> -static void __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n)
> +static void __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(struct obj_cgroup *objcg,
> + unsigned short id, unsigned int n)
> {
> - if (refcount_sub_and_test(n, &memcg->private_id_ref)) {
> - mem_cgroup_private_id_remove(memcg);
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg_free;
>
> - /* Memcg ID pins CSS */
> - css_put(&memcg->css);
> + if (refcount_sub_and_test(n, &objcg->private_id_ref)) {
> + objcg_free = xa_erase(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, id);
> + VM_WARN_ON(objcg_free != objcg);
> +
> + /* Memcg ID pins the objcg */
> + obj_cgroup_put(objcg);
> }
> }
>
> static inline void mem_cgroup_private_id_put(unsigned short id, unsigned int n)
> {
> - struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - memcg = mem_cgroup_from_private_id(id);
> - __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(memcg, n);
> + objcg = obj_cgroup_from_private_id(id);
> + __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(objcg, id, n);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> static void mem_cgroup_private_id_kill(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> {
> - __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(memcg, 1);
> + __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(memcg->private_id_objcg, memcg->private_id, 1);
> }
>
> unsigned short mem_cgroup_private_id_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int n)
> {
> - while (!refcount_add_not_zero(n, &memcg->private_id_ref)) {
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
Please add a blank line between the variable definition and the assertion.
> + lockdep_assert_once(rcu_read_lock_held());
> +
> + objcg = memcg->private_id_objcg;
> +
> + while (!refcount_add_not_zero(n, &objcg->private_id_ref)) {
> /*
> * The root cgroup cannot be destroyed, so it's refcount must
> * always be >= 1.
> @@ -4119,6 +4140,7 @@ unsigned short mem_cgroup_private_id_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int
> break;
> }
> memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
> + objcg = memcg->private_id_objcg;
> }
>
> return mem_cgroup_private_id(memcg);
> @@ -4129,11 +4151,24 @@ unsigned short mem_cgroup_private_id_get(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int
> * @id: the memcg id to look up
> *
> * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock().
> + *
> + * @return: the memcg, or NULL if the memcg referred to is already dead.
> */
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_private_id(unsigned short id)
> {
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
It would be better to add a blank line here as well.
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> - return xa_load(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, id);
> +
> + objcg = obj_cgroup_from_private_id(id);
> + if (!objcg)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
> + if (mem_cgroup_private_id(memcg) != id)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return memcg;
> }
>
> struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_get_from_id(u64 id)
> @@ -4228,18 +4263,21 @@ static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *parent)
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> int node, cpu;
> int __maybe_unused i;
> + unsigned int private_id;
This could be a separate cleanup patch.
> long error;
>
> memcg = kmem_cache_zalloc(memcg_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!memcg)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - error = xa_alloc(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, &memcg->private_id, NULL,
> + error = xa_alloc(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, &private_id, NULL,
> XA_LIMIT(1, MEM_CGROUP_ID_MAX), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (error)
> goto fail;
> error = -ENOMEM;
>
> + memcg->private_id = private_id;
> +
> memcg->vmstats = kzalloc_obj(struct memcg_vmstats, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> if (!memcg->vmstats)
> goto fail;
> @@ -4380,9 +4418,10 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> FLUSH_TIME);
> lru_gen_online_memcg(memcg);
>
> - /* Online state pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins CSS */
> - refcount_set(&memcg->private_id_ref, 1);
> - css_get(css);
> + /* CSS pins memcg ID, memcg ID pins obj cgroup */
> + memcg->private_id_objcg = objcg;
> + refcount_set(&memcg->private_id_objcg->private_id_ref, 1);
> + obj_cgroup_get(memcg->private_id_objcg);
>
> /*
> * Ensure mem_cgroup_from_private_id() works once we're fully online.
> @@ -4394,7 +4433,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
> * publish it here at the end of onlining. This matches the
> * regular ID destruction during offlining.
> */
> - xa_store(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, memcg->private_id, memcg, GFP_KERNEL);
> + xa_store(&mem_cgroup_private_ids, memcg->private_id, memcg->private_id_objcg, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> return 0;
> free_objcg:
> @@ -5832,8 +5871,6 @@ static void __init memcg_struct_check(void)
> memory_events_local);
> CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_write_hot,
> vmpressure);
> - CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_write_hot,
> - private_id_ref);
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_NMI_SAFETY_REQUIRES_ATOMIC
> CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_write_hot,
> kmem_stat);
> @@ -5878,6 +5915,8 @@ static void __init memcg_struct_check(void)
> CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_read_mostly,
> zswap_writeback);
> #endif
> + CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_read_mostly,
> + private_id_objcg);
> CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_read_mostly,
> private_id);
> CACHELINE_ASSERT_GROUP_MEMBER(struct mem_cgroup, memcg_read_mostly,
> @@ -6015,10 +6054,12 @@ int __mem_cgroup_try_charge_swap(struct folio *folio)
> */
> void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(unsigned short id, unsigned int nr_pages)
> {
> + struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - memcg = mem_cgroup_from_private_id(id);
> + objcg = obj_cgroup_from_private_id(id);
> + memcg = obj_cgroup_memcg(objcg);
> if (memcg) {
> if (!mem_cgroup_private_id_is_root(id)) {
> if (do_memsw_account())
> @@ -6027,7 +6068,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_swap(unsigned short id, unsigned int nr_pages)
> page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->swap, nr_pages);
> }
> mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_SWAP, -nr_pages);
> - mem_cgroup_private_id_put(id, nr_pages);
> + __mem_cgroup_private_id_put(objcg, id, nr_pages);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
> index 8412f4840ae35..7e4fbc5a786d6 100644
> --- a/mm/workingset.c
> +++ b/mm/workingset.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,9 @@ static bool lru_gen_test_recent(void *shadow, struct lruvec **lruvec,
> unpack_shadow(shadow, &memcg_id, &pgdat, token, workingset);
>
> memcg = mem_cgroup_from_private_id(memcg_id);
> + if (!memcg)
> + return false;
> +
> *lruvec = mem_cgroup_lruvec(memcg, pgdat);
>
> max_seq = READ_ONCE((*lruvec)->lrugen.max_seq);
> @@ -470,7 +473,7 @@ bool workingset_test_recent(void *shadow, bool file, bool *workingset,
> * configurations instead.
> */
> eviction_memcg = mem_cgroup_from_private_id(memcgid);
> - if (!mem_cgroup_tryget(eviction_memcg))
> + if (eviction_memcg && !mem_cgroup_tryget(eviction_memcg))
> eviction_memcg = NULL;
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-19 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-18 9:18 [PATCH 0/4] memcg: move memcgid refcount to objcg to unpin dying memcgs Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay
2026-09-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] memcg: keep swap charging under RCU protection Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay
2026-09-18 12:07 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-18 16:46 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-18 17:51 ` Bingfang Guo
2026-09-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 2/4] memcg: base swap charge accounting on memcgid root status Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay
2026-09-19 2:56 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 3/4] memcg: manipulate memcg private ID references by ID Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay
2026-09-18 18:14 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-18 18:46 ` Bingfang Guo
2026-09-18 20:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-19 3:06 ` Muchun Song
2026-09-18 9:18 ` [PATCH 4/4] memcg: move memcg private ID refcount to objcg Bingfang Guo via B4 Relay
2026-09-18 18:19 ` Shakeel Butt
2026-09-18 19:14 ` Bingfang Guo
2026-09-19 3:32 ` Muchun Song [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e4ec1370-27cf-40db-ba4e-b46fe54fa882@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=bfguo@icloud.com \
--cc=bingfangguo@tencent.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®