From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-179.mta0.migadu.com (out-179.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EC1B356A10 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768218144; cv=none; b=F5Jvy1vPzXJpZA852gHu5f9wcVEMcoKpMceLIsvldch278+lvrCVviEztjLSV6qF4RQwlgGUWsgz9SnIEC0HiFMNgz06IXwaCEvsn1GksBPOsUnXPo8+1lGOnENxiqiYwsGtD4C0k0zhPYXx4WDZAyagQaW417/77F6RijsuqoM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768218144; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z/ArGWZ0ymurQ9RwS25hqPmwVaTuHQEKtYq863o9s8E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=hXL87BEFgP+5Vy4PMfYbHusL9eKcsL+YWPwD8wUhfnYFbpN4whtCl2M1V2op2FXPre0KrhHL/vDFoBOj/Gy4hZLya4ZIg8uglO8mFKSbBdrjlP7wYqgqfaBOyhPTLMTK3zo6zrh3EBCqqANN/TmCIxCmdq9/sksrSO2zpJ1TlJg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=lV/Q/faM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.179 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="lV/Q/faM" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1768218141; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tkpHsuvE6V8Bk7Pqpm7Lok7WPhoO3vgdm1OBWx3Et7o=; b=lV/Q/faMYufFVo58zKJkIRqEafbT+KpNpulx33db8hdn6J4sI1BWiWOosUf6Ek/cCRBIhO KU9bhvsHMYKsn+fdylQwyFXHyi5w0X61+ohFK6XC7nvYu5pGLrGcavFqRxf0SDTOhENyR8 tRwZyKGE09xb+1e6XCUHMbGgRSSiehM= Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:41:35 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() To: Fushuai Wang , wangfushuai@baidu.com Cc: Jason@zx2c4.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: <20251005133936.32667-1-wangfushuai@baidu.com> <20260112031021.81853-1-fushuai.wang@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: <20260112031021.81853-1-fushuai.wang@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 12/01/2026 03:10, Fushuai Wang wrote: >> Replace call_rcu() + kmem_cache_free() with kfree_rcu() to simplify >> the code and reduce function size. > > Gentle ping. I believe you have to resend the patch as it's not going to be automatically re-evaluated. And you have to rebase it on top of current net-next. While preparing new patch, please add clear indentification of the target tree, the subject should look like "[PATCH net-next v3] ..." in your case.