From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:03:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e51863c0-496b-9630-e61a-2faa74356118@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230815063526.9022-3-ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
On 15/08/2023 07:35, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> ARM Coresight PMU architecture specification [1] defines PMEVTYPER and
> PMEVFILT* registers as optional in Chapter 2.1. Moreover, implementers may
> choose to use PMIMPDEF* registers (offset: 0xD80-> 0xDFF) to filter the
> events. Add support for those by adding implementation specific filter
> callback function.
>
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0091/latest
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com>
> Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 6387cbad7a7d..94f6856ec786 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -116,6 +116,9 @@ static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(arm_cspmu_lock);
>
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> +
> static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev)
> {
> return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> @@ -450,6 +453,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible);
> + CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -811,9 +815,9 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset);
> }
>
> -static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> - struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
> - u32 filter)
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
> + u32 filter)
> {
> u32 offset = PMEVFILTR + (4 * hwc->idx);
>
> @@ -845,7 +849,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags)
> arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter);
> } else {
> arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc);
> - arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
> + cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
> }
>
> hwc->state = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index e5c6dff2ce7f..274ca3d10578 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event);
> /* Decode filter value from configs */
> u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event);
> + /* Set event filter */
> + void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> /* Hide/show unsupported events */
> umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr, int unused);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-16 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-15 6:35 [PATCH v6 0/4] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs Ilkka Koskinen
2023-08-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes Ilkka Koskinen
2023-08-15 10:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-15 20:46 ` Ilkka Koskinen
2023-08-16 14:00 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters Ilkka Koskinen
2023-08-16 14:03 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2023-08-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation Ilkka Koskinen
2023-08-16 14:05 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-15 6:35 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU Ilkka Koskinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e51863c0-496b-9630-e61a-2faa74356118@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=bwicaksono@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ilkka@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®