mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:17:06 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5406694-0382-fafe-d22a-ad8913ccc4c2@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924225959.GY29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

Hi Paul,

On 9/25/2020 4:29 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:04:10PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>> Clarify the "x" in rcuox/N naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
>> description.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> 
> Applied with a few additional updates as shown below.  As always, please
> let me know if I messed anything up.
> 

Looks good! thanks!


Thanks
Neeraj

> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> commit 8d1d776b4998896a6f8f4608edb0b258bd37ec9f
> Author: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Date:   Thu Sep 24 12:04:10 2020 +0530
> 
>      rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
>      
>      This commit clarifies that the "p" and the "s" in the in the RCU_NOCB_CPU
>      config-option description refer to the "x" in the "rcuox/N" kthread name.
>      
>      Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
>      [ paulmck: While in the area, update description and advice. ]
>      Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index b71e21f..cdc57b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -221,19 +221,23 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU
>   	  Use this option to reduce OS jitter for aggressive HPC or
>   	  real-time workloads.	It can also be used to offload RCU
>   	  callback invocation to energy-efficient CPUs in battery-powered
> -	  asymmetric multiprocessors.
> +	  asymmetric multiprocessors.  The price of this reduced jitter
> +	  is that the overhead of call_rcu() increases and that some
> +	  workloads will incur significant increases in context-switch
> +	  rates.
>   
>   	  This option offloads callback invocation from the set of CPUs
>   	  specified at boot time by the rcu_nocbs parameter.  For each
>   	  such CPU, a kthread ("rcuox/N") will be created to invoke
>   	  callbacks, where the "N" is the CPU being offloaded, and where
> -	  the "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for RCU-sched
> -	  (!PREEMPTION kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread from running
> -	  on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be preempted
> -	  between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can be used
> -	  to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is desired.
> -
> -	  Say Y here if you want to help to debug reduced OS jitter.
> +	  the "x" is "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for
> +	  RCU-sched (!PREEMPTION kernels).  Nothing prevents this kthread
> +	  from running on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be
> +	  preempted between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can
> +	  be used to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is
> +	  desired.
> +
> +	  Say Y here if you need reduced OS jitter, despite added overhead.
>   	  Say N here if you are unsure.
>   
>   config TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB
> 

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24  6:34 Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-09-24 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-25  5:47   ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
2020-09-28  0:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-28  3:41   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e5406694-0382-fafe-d22a-ad8913ccc4c2@codeaurora.org \
    --to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®