From: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
To: paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:17:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e5406694-0382-fafe-d22a-ad8913ccc4c2@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200924225959.GY29330@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Hi Paul,
On 9/25/2020 4:29 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 12:04:10PM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>> Clarify the "x" in rcuox/N naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
>> description.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
>
> Applied with a few additional updates as shown below. As always, please
> let me know if I messed anything up.
>
Looks good! thanks!
Thanks
Neeraj
> Thanx, Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 8d1d776b4998896a6f8f4608edb0b258bd37ec9f
> Author: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> Date: Thu Sep 24 12:04:10 2020 +0530
>
> rcu: Clarify nocb kthreads naming in RCU_NOCB_CPU config
>
> This commit clarifies that the "p" and the "s" in the in the RCU_NOCB_CPU
> config-option description refer to the "x" in the "rcuox/N" kthread name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> [ paulmck: While in the area, update description and advice. ]
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> index b71e21f..cdc57b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
> @@ -221,19 +221,23 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU
> Use this option to reduce OS jitter for aggressive HPC or
> real-time workloads. It can also be used to offload RCU
> callback invocation to energy-efficient CPUs in battery-powered
> - asymmetric multiprocessors.
> + asymmetric multiprocessors. The price of this reduced jitter
> + is that the overhead of call_rcu() increases and that some
> + workloads will incur significant increases in context-switch
> + rates.
>
> This option offloads callback invocation from the set of CPUs
> specified at boot time by the rcu_nocbs parameter. For each
> such CPU, a kthread ("rcuox/N") will be created to invoke
> callbacks, where the "N" is the CPU being offloaded, and where
> - the "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for RCU-sched
> - (!PREEMPTION kernels). Nothing prevents this kthread from running
> - on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be preempted
> - between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can be used
> - to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is desired.
> -
> - Say Y here if you want to help to debug reduced OS jitter.
> + the "x" is "p" for RCU-preempt (PREEMPTION kernels) and "s" for
> + RCU-sched (!PREEMPTION kernels). Nothing prevents this kthread
> + from running on the specified CPUs, but (1) the kthreads may be
> + preempted between each callback, and (2) affinity or cgroups can
> + be used to force the kthreads to run on whatever set of CPUs is
> + desired.
> +
> + Say Y here if you need reduced OS jitter, despite added overhead.
> Say N here if you are unsure.
>
> config TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-25 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-24 6:34 Neeraj Upadhyay
2020-09-24 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-25 5:47 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
2020-09-28 0:13 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-09-28 3:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e5406694-0382-fafe-d22a-ad8913ccc4c2@codeaurora.org \
--to=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®