mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: merez@codeaurora.org
To: "Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@samsung.com>
Cc: svenkatr@ti.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	"'Chris Ball'" <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	kgene.kim@samsung.com, dh.han@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Add packed command for eMMC4.5 device
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 03:51:26 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e56e6a44db4d8a0103825c1cc909f125.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (raw)

> +			if (reqs >= 2) {
> +				mmc_blk_packed_hdr_wrq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, mq, reqs);
> +				if (rq_data_dir(rqc) == READ) {
> +					areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
> +					mmc_wait_for_req(card->host, areq->mrq);
Packing read requests requires preparation of two requests. After sending
the header we wait for its completion before sending the next request
(mmc_wait_for_req is used). Therefore, if we try to pack 2 read requests
we might end up with worse performance in comparison to sending each
request by itself (which allows the preparation of one request while the
other is sent).
I suggest to check the size of the packed commands list and in case it is
less than 3 send the requests one by one. If you move mmc_blk_chk_packable
to queue.c after the first fetch this change should be very easy and can
be done by removing the requests from the packed_list and calling issue_fn
for each one of them.

Thanks,
Maya Erez
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum







             reply	other threads:[~2011-11-16 11:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-16 11:51 merez [this message]
2011-11-17  2:23 ` Seungwon Jeon
2011-11-20 19:41   ` merez
     [not found] <1319712841-28579-1-git-send-email-tgih.jun@samsung.com>
     [not found] ` <CANfBPZ_i3wcPkBnv-wOYbSUib=0k9bpem3ZGWg4TcjNE9NZywg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-28  5:44   ` Seungwon Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e56e6a44db4d8a0103825c1cc909f125.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org \
    --to=merez@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=dh.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome