RE: [PATCH] Remove warning printk

[Insop Song <Insop.Song@gainspeed.com>]

Hi Greg,

Will send out a new patch mail with single patch shortly.

I have not yet find a good way to reply mail and add patch yet with my mailing server/client.

That's why I send out a separate email instead of replying to Arnd.

Below is his email and it has his signed-off, that's why I put that in my patch you got.

I took that out from a new patch to make it clear on your end.

Regards,

ISS

Here is Arnd's original email 
________________________________________
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 8:48 AM
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Insop Song
Subject: [PATCH] staging: gs_fpgaboot: remove __TIMESTAMP__ macro

We specifically build the kernel with -Werror=date-time to detect
such macros, which gives us this error:

gs_fpgaboot/gs_fpgaboot.c:376:44: error: macro "__TIMESTAMP__" might prevent reproducible builds [-Werror=date-time]
  pr_info("built at %s UTC\n", __TIMESTAMP__);

The obvious fix is to remove the printk output line.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

diff --git a/drivers/staging/gs_fpgaboot/gs_fpgaboot.c b/drivers/staging/gs_fpgaboot/gs_fpgaboot.c
index 89bc84d..7506900 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/gs_fpgaboot/gs_fpgaboot.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/gs_fpgaboot/gs_fpgaboot.c
@@ -373,7 +373,6 @@ static int __init gs_fpgaboot_init(void)
        r = -1;

        pr_info("FPGA DOWNLOAD --->\n");
-       pr_info("built at %s UTC\n", __TIMESTAMP__);

        pr_info("FPGA image file name: %s\n", file);



________________________________________
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:49 PM
To: Insop Song
Cc: insop.song@gmail.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove warning printk

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 08:54:43PM -0700, Insop Song wrote:
> Found from build with option -Werror=date-time
>
> Signed-off-by: Insop Song <insop.song@gainspeed.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Did Arnd really sign off on this?

And what is with the "odd" subject, your first email should have been
the subject of this one.  We don't need a "cover letter" for a one-patch
email sequence.

Care to fix this up and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h