From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>, <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<ming.lei@redhat.com>, <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 0/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 09:57:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6069080-61e7-4345-8ff3-a26756a1c76c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbdf64cd-7d31-f470-b93c-5b42a1e1cf40@huawei.com>
On 26/11/2021 11:51, John Garry wrote:
>> This patch set improves above call trace even after disk_util=0 is set.
> ok, fine. Thanks for testing.
>
> So I guess that this is a regression, and you would want this series for
> v5.16, right? My changes were made with v5.17 in mind.
>
> I am not sure how Jens feels about it, since the changes are
> significant. It would be a lot easier to argue for v5.16 if we got to
> this point earlier in the cycle...
>
note: I will now resend for 5.17 and add your tested-by, please let me
know if unhappy about that.
> Anyway, it would be good to have full review first, so please help with
> that.
>
> @Ming, can you please give feedback on 3/3 here?
Thanks and also to Hannes for the reviews.
john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-06 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-02 11:27 John Garry
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 1/3] blk-mq: Drop busy_iter_fn blk_mq_hw_ctx argument John Garry
2021-11-09 3:02 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-28 10:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 2/3] blk-mq: Delete busy_iter_fn John Garry
2021-11-09 3:05 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-28 10:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-02 11:27 ` [PATCH RFT 3/3] blk-mq: Optimise blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() for shared tags John Garry
2021-11-28 10:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-11-29 2:19 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-15 15:56 ` [PATCH RFT 0/3] " John Garry
2021-11-15 16:31 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-25 13:46 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-25 14:09 ` John Garry
2021-11-26 11:25 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-11-26 11:51 ` John Garry
2021-12-06 9:57 ` John Garry [this message]
2021-12-06 10:03 ` Kashyap Desai
2021-12-08 13:04 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6069080-61e7-4345-8ff3-a26756a1c76c@huawei.com \
--to=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®