From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>, Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: initialize CFR locks before capability checks
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2026 12:27:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6213779-bed7-4484-a230-ff3508e8ec65@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261009060326.1162818-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
On 10/9/2026 11:33 AM, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> ath11k_cfr_init() returns before initializing cfr->lock when CFR
> capability is absent. However, station removal still calls
> ath11k_cfr_decrement_peer_count(), which unconditionally takes this
> lock. This leaves a production path using an uninitialized spinlock.
>
> Initialize cfr->lock for every radio before the capability check. Keep
> the CFR ring and lookup-table lock initialization conditional, since
> those objects are only used after CFR capability setup.
>
> Fixes: 9b2e3b4ebec7 ("wifi: ath11k: Add initialization and deinitialization sequence for CFR module")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/cfr.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/cfr.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/cfr.c
> index a91f25fb6..0708ca28b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/cfr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/cfr.c
> @@ -956,6 +956,9 @@ int ath11k_cfr_init(struct ath11k_base *ab)
> struct ath11k *ar;
> int i, ret;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < ab->num_radios; i++)
> + spin_lock_init(&ab->pdevs[i].ar->cfr.lock);
> +
> if (!test_bit(WMI_TLV_SERVICE_CFR_CAPTURE_SUPPORT, ab->wmi_ab.svc_map) ||
> !ab->hw_params.cfr_support)
> return 0;
> @@ -971,7 +974,6 @@ int ath11k_cfr_init(struct ath11k_base *ab)
>
> idr_init(&cfr->rx_ring.bufs_idr);
> spin_lock_init(&cfr->rx_ring.idr_lock);
> - spin_lock_init(&cfr->lock);
> spin_lock_init(&cfr->lut_lock);
>
> num_lut_entries = min_t(u32, CFR_MAX_LUT_ENTRIES, db_cap.min_elem);
NAK. This can never happen.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-09 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-09 6:03 Runyu Xiao
2026-10-09 6:57 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan [this message]
2026-10-09 22:07 ` Jeff Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6213779-bed7-4484-a230-ff3508e8ec65@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®