From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com [209.85.221.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6651139A7EC for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 18:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768587027; cv=none; b=RuyEa0dSVI75Hm5J685SZVQ6IRdeTwfmlUaIE3uy/cZn7sjrbpVo3Y8FBLHocE/cj7ie4sfG+AbjjOBrGw4FQFhvTw5b2IIkKwmhS4AExv7ICYzw9vO8RzpCsQud4e5m88Qnn+St+6eM/X1/OEmQUndTLqOKWBCNUWJH4lV55l0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768587027; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6hskCYlFubyn15wgG2emHMYCY5r7YeiupgPne045cUk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Wl1VSAS1c+VUnOVZF0kDJ4FqmWTskbvqJvssyuGyzCB3QxT7Umg4sBmIRD5rx8DdCtJywVAOaR0PsHwvGb8ITQL6VMhmKpL60mPDhjN0V3huG96NLzN40nHezfvdp7KPaETXxZeMHE7xmG+jb+SAA0QW3HFFSATPC3fCFxfQDnk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ISg8OEnu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ISg8OEnu" Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-430fbb6012bso1804421f8f.1 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 10:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1768587023; x=1769191823; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=V5RD9n0+7pfnaaKlaAgMUnASY55x/U5KRexVVkClUMI=; b=ISg8OEnuJn9jWKznPXVFGmI3+qm/A2RjEpxvzBn4soCXUhxJFXpcB6rO2TUzpOQSB0 qINZ8VIOAnJuqX/KIsYslEnaxqru6B4dEUALpLmVP2FZYebxa4bYtp8skQCwpUvR3mh0 av+MmLF3+OdmILtHPtdQ1AScB9HM3NFAg6SIOzEg+HTU5a5rKqDrfqgXBwJSX8MOvwVM NKfFrtRopenqiG11PmiqViWIvnxWaF4uNS0Wk1fIV7SObv3v56v+MKcwrySVGoRFiv+s YnJmgixeTmBs3o6FZBrXo9SsK8Uic0Qyl6mw2U4r2rGHloieD24WyPnf1hHYS0ZzNqgO GriA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768587023; x=1769191823; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=V5RD9n0+7pfnaaKlaAgMUnASY55x/U5KRexVVkClUMI=; b=XoNo3iEH4pTkfmjfcwb80hbPXkoadrXS3aAvIJIm4yzx1JvDTdQr44DfWXbvT+l9sm FYrDuJvQGt7h/eNDw2XqwSD2wiNfZu7rKkZxoWitbqFMzAAG8d7v4EIP+R91aPCuATTQ gx1aDRA2ZaMrCnSiLjElU4KglHZyPcqYcJm1tY4dn85y/gcOBveWRElqFizFAHdxZ3Vv GZCWo5mqMmtrM4YgFsEN01LkbV/sXsiA2GjLqPzjzEfp8NEaqpyKdBuzdn/eZI/AE4gU 0VNuYFTv7T04ZdUzKVwoSdqB9CDTG2c/UPldSWp+uk4LE7rd0jm6mXBbgeKW3FMefo5M 5CDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YweQFSnguzz5ImVLsb3RtFFIWIBx9mUX/HN91G2ci/ud1eyBjQh 1SuZblR3ixlXTT1UTJzJD5zEYsMPsftXT1sXiDc16hJWPJCudEFbrQRH X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX4vTbY/NZb6k1A5laX5SPO2QxmjCY+Md1vb2elXg4rMxEgUscPiI7l3emwr7Ls nxsv9AKPGAEzevAQ1gghnQRVS9VsrNqs84AA5pZVKxlIc7PDJqZu1jOyYJoFRApE0WauCl6rpiK w/9+e0zsE0LJEVdwMRcP7EV7b3eUpsBzB8VR+jiecs2nBbYYahCE2KU3SzG5TMv+TEuvAD7/i1V w/b5dxxer5VgHnEacuaQnXrDbuwzZS/njASUd92ZBWaJSSZfqijON7IXX82eEeYmfRDQetg/0R2 jOWYKCBNEEYEKmE+GTMnTp56BUEdWTn19nwVQbM4lBgjeo65Um1sZ3JyH6J76qf3lTM+xOKDtGx Go7XlLbAO5PW4P/V5C3dnMBtsuRDRKyaCFvF8wfnC3aGpjB7WemA2S5Yhie9BDqwZOoXMfATxc3 OscuMsXPayhiRvUh2xhKsetw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1843:b0:431:864:d492 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-43569bbaf7dmr4756064f8f.36.1768587022464; Fri, 16 Jan 2026 10:10:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.121] ([151.61.25.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-435699271dfsm6434012f8f.15.2026.01.16.10.10.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Jan 2026 10:10:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2026 19:10:21 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] platform/x86: asus-wmi: move keyboard control firmware attributes To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ilpo_J=C3=A4rvinen?= , Denis Benato Cc: LKML , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , "Luke D . Jones" , Mateusz Schyboll References: <20260102234344.366227-1-denis.benato@linux.dev> <88609e7c-3348-440e-adc0-eed9dc4d452c@linux.dev> <992b2843-4afa-ede1-d276-8ccaa61b1fee@linux.intel.com> <2e1f5ce5-3647-4dff-b67e-327b0c1cb12e@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US, it-IT, en-US-large From: Denis Benato In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 1/14/26 10:04, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2026, Denis Benato wrote: > >> On 1/13/26 15:02, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2026, Denis Benato wrote: >>>> On 1/3/26 00:43, Denis Benato wrote: >>>>> I was recently reading through the asusctl issue tracker and I found >>>>> out that some users have been having troubles with the keyboard RGB control >>>>> that was working before since the creation of asus-armoury and subequent >>>>> deprecation of old sysfs attributes. >>>>> >>>>> This patch series aims to re-introduce those attributes in asus-armoury >>>>> so that userspace tools can still control keyboard RGB lighting >>>>> without having to rely on deprecated asus-wmi attributes. >>>>> >>>>> In addition to that, since disabling OOBE is essential for controlling >>>>> LEDs on some models and it was incorrectly tied to deprecated attributes, >>>>> this patch series also fixes sending OOBE at probe time. >>>>> >>>>> Link: https://gitlab.com/asus-linux/asusctl/-/issues/619 >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Denis >>>> Hi Ilpo, >>>> >>>> I see no comments on this revision, did I sent it at wrong time? >>>> Should I resend some other time? >>>> >>>> Sorry for the question but I don't know if something went wrong, >>>> and if so what exactly. >>> Hi, >>> >>> Nothing is wrong, I've just had to spend time on finally processing >>> some larger next series which were even older than yours. And we're only 1 >>> week past a holiday period which tend to add to delay. >> Oh okay, thank you for letting me know! I feared I repeated the error >> I made on the netdev list :) >>> Patchwork keeps track of pdx86 patches: >>> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/platform-driver-x86/list/ >>> >>> If your patch is listed there, there's no need to ping as I'll get it it >>> eventually (and it won't get forgotten). >> Understood! Sorry for the inconvenient :D >>> There's no "wrong time" to send a patch to pdx86, only that when the >>> merge window is open, I might do processing of any patches during that > In case it wasn't obvious, I meant: I might not do processing of any > patches during the merge window. Sure! Don't worry I was just attempting to avoid ending in a place where everyone forgot these patches as this feature in particular has been forgotten already once XD >>> time. But unlike some other subsystems, we don't disallow sending patches >>> during merge window or any other time. >>> >> That's very good to know. Thank you very much, always very informative! >>