From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtpout-03.galae.net (smtpout-03.galae.net [185.246.85.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8107B37BE85 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775724026; cv=none; b=VGJO5VKp7J4vE+VAhYz7GT0KDa4y0AAqY1O5Mrq8JyhN2Fw9QRX9O0Bvj+EnaoUsL2Opy0js655ul2+MyPATgHdK7wLFoVChd0CdoeKJKQoCYjl9rVfGeErSeFpdh4J8K12sShpggqeUNnNuvJrJBwagK/XNBnXg4/SB78TFswo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775724026; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rtao9N9/Zr6M6atUlSC7Uf3NJjJsFhoS0cSwJqwdQGY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=p0f2qeoeNXCwEMFHm80PxfI+O8a9jpy7532FArvdGSR9upaSZwA/RzTcc+0wcEB32BbN3TovFJp0TBr0CpoW/+Aji6YtUCvlRlsM6qp97wEe7lNz+9YWb4OG3a33OzQi+VIV0w7KdW66h+MMPNVCym3GHpJpGmurq7TD4Mm/cnE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=ulCKhMG/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.246.85.4 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="ulCKhMG/" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-03.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF5254E42990; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E975FDEB; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 08:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id CECEF104500A8; Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:40:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1775724021; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=uROhnwnHliOgM+Qmr3h9fZz3BgpvJO5hwrCBupSyy5s=; b=ulCKhMG/xHNUs28wb39v3ofJV+4Ajt03BAUdcxoh0ZYwHCofP5ewtFtUnWSxdGIIOZHB6y mufbilUuGFk8/gFpqVcpW4Azdr4c+S7hZfMlgQXU/WWtOZRiqlj4E3JgFYSwSlvH90mbCM qf/fOk9PBRbXVuZ82ZZy/1BSK7JkhqdKfkH7tiPlFWERXBr0X+n64QWnnKGsBwQkB7kulK 2igavCR/4s1y66wcRrFoSOMqOA68/vz36sgRARItdJVXout+mIwS1aLkWpj8oUb9VmGQ2C te4VPRYZatJxzbOAo5oiQaRt+a4LMFZ6NbH2cNX745+SKnyX6LTM5jTAfloYfw== Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 10:40:13 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/10] net: phy_port: SFP modules representation and phy_port listing To: Paolo Abeni , davem@davemloft.net, Andrew Lunn , Jakub Kicinski , Eric Dumazet , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Christophe Leroy , Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=B6ry_Maincent?= , =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Beh=C3=BAn?= , Oleksij Rempel , =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2_Veronese?= , Simon Horman , mwojtas@chromium.org, Romain Gantois , Daniel Golle , Dimitri Fedrau References: <20260403123755.175742-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> <76e290cd-22bd-4ed3-b2b3-036e1edff140@redhat.com> From: Maxime Chevallier Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <76e290cd-22bd-4ed3-b2b3-036e1edff140@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 On 09/04/2026 09:35, Paolo Abeni wrote: > @Maxime: I went over sashiko feedback and I *think* it ranges from > orthogonal to wrong, but it would be useful if you could go over it. Yeah I've looked at its feedback, and indeed most of it is incorrect or irrelevant :( Let's see if the PHY crew have things to say on the overall approach :) Thanks for pinging on this, Maxime > > Thanks, > > Paolo