From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB3221E32A3 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 06:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751266584; cv=none; b=nrHG+PsgKGPB21sGYcCFI3pm9cpJWRk6zanivQJlA4Pah+S06EC1wUdbfw6FoMaLIOmnf5h3queGlEr1+jB5A9HhFhfGTPW3YINmvsFl1NpRPxryMkpqQ2x7TPHiGQpCa6Jxk1q6zMat+4G6xNCvfu0ToyBq0Q6YVJpH1vGyfH4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751266584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9k4TDCp1s1sw9Eu4SIhTH14EyDKmYapBGy/5BhYSTlk=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=uH4EK5SA3aQg7enGe6IcOjue2cNWm78G7XJyjcQXdljn0qs//Rs1wpXYJZEGP6e7pNCBwMavTqP/mCZ1G4We4YlV/tMzAMl4C1LPqsCyPrTDSyhW55iJJ/M+UYU8ZbThA8pB6PjG5l/HcIRoLdX6MJpQFelJ8rAvagNX20BvYE8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=DfLz/HnA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="DfLz/HnA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender: Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=9k4TDCp1s1sw9Eu4SIhTH14EyDKmYapBGy/5BhYSTlk=; t=1751266583; x=1752476183; b=DfLz/HnA6ewL/qa4P2Rk6gPe+xgW6kOhwOTPMi/j5ZuHusP YbEsh2a+kg7EgM2ejqGcAXjNUBygiC1YLrxQ+BKuZcn3SMwxb3ne5Ega1p6ioM3TpSOZSeTzMN2XC bmLl4BX8hmEJ1zHMC23KQfcMjIQ5FPvFHfWbDGeYUHoMH1FI1XbCZoNzpwiPm1ILigeOgAidxjvlH LlWsIQ92tJ1jKRFRC48OnExd6inq1s+oPnwOAg8nWqB1zMA8Fk6IpTdH7es4ObVFB1OxOkATiwMdP 7YVcFQevKv4qOyxeeqx/J1vEJD4cU95VdTOjC23HTYV4BJAwilA3GDYU/fvzxlLg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uW8Qm-00000000avX-2lH3; Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:55:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] um: virt-pci: Switch to msi_create_parent_irq_domain() From: Johannes Berg To: Nam Cao , Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 08:55:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5f0bd8e877e7bfdfb1a7e99d6b126caf6a7eea48.1751266049.git.namcao@linutronix.de> (sfid-20250630_085140_752354_0F18E422) References: <5f0bd8e877e7bfdfb1a7e99d6b126caf6a7eea48.1751266049.git.namcao@linutronix.de> (sfid-20250630_085140_752354_0F18E422) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.56.2 (3.56.2-1.fc42) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Mon, 2025-06-30 at 08:51 +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > Move away from the legacy MSI domain setup, switch to use > msi_create_parent_irq_domain(). >=20 Do you want this to go through the UML tree, or is it a dependency somewhere else? In the latter case, I suppose you can add Acked-by: Johannes Berg Tested-by: Johannes Berg johannes