From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Arthur Simchaev <Arthur.Simchaev@wdc.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] include: uapi: scsi: Change utp_upiu_query struct
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 10:44:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6518637-4e78-3935-133d-79afea67cf80@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR04MB632701F87296BEE554D3F055EDAD9@BY5PR04MB6327.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On 3/1/23 01:46, Arthur Simchaev wrote:
>>>>> struct utp_upiu_query {
>>>>> __u8 opcode;
>>>>> __u8 idn;
>>>>> __u8 index;
>>>>> __u8 selector;
>>>>> - __be16 reserved_osf;
>>>>> - __be16 length;
>>>>> - __be32 value;
>>>>> - __be32 reserved[2];
>>>>> + __u8 osf3;
>>>>> + __u8 osf4;
>>>>> + __be16 osf5;
>>>>> + __be32 osf6;
>>>>> + __be32 osf7;
>>>>> };
>>>> All changes in UAPI headers must be backwards compatible. The above
>> doesn't look like a backwards compatible change to me.
>>>
>>> This API was originally invented to support ufs-bsg.
>>> AFAIK, ufs-utils is the only app that makes use of this API,
>>> and it doesn't dig into struct utp_upiu_query inner fields.
>>
>> That does not match what I see. I see that code in ufs-utils accesses
>> the 'length' and 'value' members of the above data structure.
>>
>> Please follow the rules for UAPI header files.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bart.
>
> You are right , my fault.
> Anyway, It just return reserved field to the struct.
> Also I can update the tool accordingly. Instead length and value fields,
> using osf5 and osf6.
> In this case we will keep it backward compatible.
> Is it OK?
Hi Arthur,
I doubt that renaming structure members is acceptable for UAPI headers.
How about introducing a second struct next to the utp_upiu_query struct?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-01 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 15:12 [PATCH 0/2] ufs: core: Add support for qTimestamp attribute Arthur Simchaev
2023-02-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] include: uapi: scsi: Change utp_upiu_query struct Arthur Simchaev
2023-02-22 15:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-02-27 16:03 ` Arthur Simchaev
2023-02-27 16:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2023-03-01 9:46 ` Arthur Simchaev
2023-03-01 18:44 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2023-03-02 7:52 ` Arthur Simchaev
2023-02-23 2:23 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-22 15:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] ufs: core: Providing Timestamp information to the device Arthur Simchaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6518637-4e78-3935-133d-79afea67cf80@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Arthur.Simchaev@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®