From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B41C35241 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D872071A for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729094AbgAYI1y (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 03:27:54 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:51044 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726293AbgAYI1y (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 03:27:54 -0500 Received: from vvs-ws.sw.ru ([172.16.24.21]) by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1ivGmu-0006Pc-Mj; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:27:28 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] seq_file .next functions should increase position index To: Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , NeilBrown , Waiman Long , Ingo Molnar , Peter Oberparleiter References: <244674e5-760c-86bd-d08a-047042881748@virtuozzo.com> <20200124105024.18d24572@gandalf.local.home> From: Vasily Averin Message-ID: Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 11:27:27 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200124105024.18d24572@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/24/20 6:50 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:36 +0300 > Vasily Averin wrote: > >> >> I've sent patches into maillists of affected subsystems already, >> this patch-set fixes the problem in files related to >> pstore, tracing, gcov, sysvipc and other subsystems processed >> via linux-kernel@ mailing list directly > > Since you sent the patches out individually, and not as the usually way > of replying to the 0/7 patch (this email), do you expect the patches to > just be accepted by the individual maintainers, and not as a series? Yes, you are right, I've missed it. Could you please review tracing-related patches of this patch set? >> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 >> >> Vasily Averin (7): >> pstore_ftrace_seq_next should increase position index >> gcov_seq_next should increase position index >> t_next should increase position index >> fpid_next should increase position index >> eval_map_next should increase position index >> trigger_next should increase position index >> sysvipc_find_ipc should increase position index >> >> fs/pstore/inode.c | 2 +- >> ipc/util.c | 2 +- >> kernel/gcov/fs.c | 2 +- >> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 9 ++++++--- >> kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 +--- >> kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 5 +++-- >> 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >