Re: rtmutex assert failure (was [Patch] restore the RCU callback...)

["Robert Crocombe" <rcrocomb@gmail.com>]

On 8/29/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> I'm going to ask what seems like a really stupid question. What's "t6" ?
> and what's the relationship of that to my patches ?

Oh, sorry, thought I'd made that clear.  Since the first patches you
put up were "t.diff" and "t2.diff", I've just been incrementing a
counter:

-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb  1941 Aug 14 08:28 t.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb  5875 Aug 14 08:28 t2.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb  9397 Aug 21 15:25 t3.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb 11289 Aug 23 09:55 t4.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb 15460 Aug 23 17:37 t5.diff
-rw-r--r-- 1 rcrocomb rcrocomb 18119 Aug 25 13:31 t6.diff

[rcrocomb@spanky patches]$ head t6.diff
#
# old_revision [c9c382f0a12ab75bee370938f9b7ad5b582cf39a]
#
# patch "arch/x86_64/kernel/smp.c"
#  from [b354a6e4a080ad49f4213ab4334ca2e57ddf1bdc]
#    to [a76a90aaad275ab3775d32ac3ae500fe120c5b8c]
#
# patch "arch/x86_64/mm/numa.c"
#  from [72976a7a4aff795f020f34e91e98e0defa280d3b]
#    to [9f2858d19a369e3aceaf084796837bd02e9bc6b7]

> [side note: I'm headed to Burning Man tomorrow and won't be on a computer
> for 6 days until I come back]

Nice!

-- 
Robert Crocombe
rcrocomb@gmail.com