From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 07:17:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6c49f30-b32a-4ad0-98e2-634113011f90@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250110115953.6058-1-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>
On 1/10/25 03:59, Patryk Wlazlyn wrote:
> Patryk Wlazlyn (4):
> x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint
> ACPI: processor_idle: Add FFH state handling
> intel_idle: Provide the default enter_dead() handler
> x86/smp: Eliminate mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint()
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 3 +++
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 10 ++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 46 ++++-------------------------------
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 2 ++
> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 15 ++++++++++++
> include/acpi/processor.h | 5 ++++
> 6 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Is everybody happy with this now?
I noticed there are no Fixes: or Cc:stable@ tags on this. Should we be
treating this like a new feature or a bug fix?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-10 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 11:59 Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] x86/smp: Allow calling mwait_play_dead with an arbitrary hint Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] ACPI: processor_idle: Add FFH state handling Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] intel_idle: Provide the default enter_dead() handler Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-02-04 0:19 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-10 11:59 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] x86/smp: Eliminate mwait_play_dead_cpuid_hint() Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-10 15:17 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2025-01-10 15:26 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry Artem Bityutskiy
2025-01-10 16:07 ` Dave Hansen
2025-01-10 16:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2025-01-16 16:02 ` Patryk Wlazlyn
2025-01-16 16:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-01-13 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e6c49f30-b32a-4ad0-98e2-634113011f90@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®