From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D54C433DF for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E024207BC for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:34:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OjwtmTh0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725939AbgE1GeV (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 02:34:21 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:22674 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725601AbgE1GeV (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 02:34:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590647660; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=A0TbfU1Wtk9UqNPHb2mnR7GHgRz5NlicH2MG30iIhdQ=; b=OjwtmTh0zrTrT55C1ugNY2uw/mCJiqwKZQPEcS9nFMDoY7Uj8LOigV5n9YQzGECOMVXP5Q UCVszqXIQFgl5u7w1vyTkSGzLnYxdhO09ZDldXEe0h+d1I4w9SXCeoHmN9ZTgQAafVqfnk X6YWrIvsBJSxvpMNQ4Vt8//23QvCE/M= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-337-V0gHZIGzPNaVCuaWjLDYHA-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 02:34:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: V0gHZIGzPNaVCuaWjLDYHA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9313E1005510; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn2-54-130.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.130]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 048385C1B0; Thu, 28 May 2020 06:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr() To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Mark Rutland , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, drjones@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, aarcange@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com References: <20200508032919.52147-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20200508032919.52147-4-gshan@redhat.com> <20200526104249.GB1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> <2e4dd03f-656a-c32b-5e87-ca28583999ef@redhat.com> <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org> From: Gavin Shan Message-ID: Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:34:05 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <359dad5546a428ea963781f2728e70bf@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/27/20 5:20 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-05-27 03:43, Gavin Shan wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> On 5/26/20 8:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:13PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>> Since kvm/arm32 was removed, this renames kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to >>>> kvm_vcpu_get_esr() to it a bit more self-explaining because the >>>> functions returns ESR instead of HSR on aarch64. This shouldn't >>>> cause any functional changes. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >>> >>> I think that this would be a nice cleanup on its own, and could be taken >>> independently of the rest of this series if it were rebased and sent as >>> a single patch. >>> >> >> Yeah, I'll see how PATCH[3,4,5] can be posted independently >> as part of the preparatory work, which is suggested by you >> in another reply. >> >> By the way, I assume the cleanup patches are good enough to >> target 5.8.rc1/rc2 if you agree. > > It's fine to base them on -rc1 or -rc2. They will not be merged > before 5.9 though. > > Thanks, > >         M. Sure, Thanks, Marc!