From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
To: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] sched/fair: default to false in test_idle_cores
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:39:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e72d9b4a-a986-3b73-d4e5-63df40a0bee1@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABk29NtfVjXQZORGB1owmBS6C9LZJn8ci15gv4nQm+2DNLEPBA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Josh, thanks for your comments!
On 6/28/22 6:53 AM, Josh Don Wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 5:05 AM Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's uncertain whether idle cores exist or not if shared sched-domains
>> are not ready, so returning "no idle cores" usually makes sense.
>>
>> While __update_idle_core() is an exception, it checks status of this
>> core and set to shared sched-domain if necessary. So the whole logic
>> depends on the existence of shared domain, and can bail out early if
>> it isn't available. Modern compilers seems capable of handling such
>> cases, so remove the tricky self-defined default return value.
>
> I don't think the compiler will be able to bail out of the smt
> iteration early, since it'll have to do another rcu dereference for
> the sd_llc in set(). But I also don't think this case needs
> optimization, since it should be transient while the domain isn't
> ready.
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Obviously I failed to comprehend the difference between the changed
assembly code, my bad..
Thanks,
Abel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-28 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-19 12:04 [PATCH v4 0/7] sched/fair: improve scan efficiency of SIS Abel Wu
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] sched/fair: default to false in test_idle_cores Abel Wu
2022-06-27 22:53 ` Josh Don
2022-06-28 3:39 ` Abel Wu [this message]
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] sched/fair: remove redundant check in select_idle_smt Abel Wu
2022-06-27 23:17 ` Josh Don
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] sched/fair: avoid double search on same cpu Abel Wu
2022-06-27 23:24 ` Josh Don
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] sched/fair: remove useless check in select_idle_core Abel Wu
2022-06-27 23:42 ` Josh Don
2022-06-28 3:51 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-29 0:41 ` Josh Don
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] sched/fair: skip SIS domain search if fully busy Abel Wu
2022-06-28 0:28 ` Josh Don
2022-06-28 6:53 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-29 1:11 ` Josh Don
2022-06-29 7:05 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-20 15:34 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-08-15 9:49 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] sched/fair: skip busy cores in SIS search Abel Wu
2022-06-21 18:14 ` Chen Yu
2022-06-22 3:52 ` [External] " Abel Wu
2022-06-24 3:30 ` Chen Yu
2022-06-27 10:13 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-28 7:58 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-30 4:16 ` Chen Yu
2022-06-30 10:46 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-09 8:55 ` Chen Yu
2022-07-09 15:56 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-11 12:02 ` Chen Yu
2022-07-13 10:25 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-22 4:03 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-20 16:16 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-08-15 9:49 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-19 12:04 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] sched/fair: de-entropy for SIS filter Abel Wu
2022-06-21 18:23 ` Chen Yu
2022-06-22 4:01 ` Abel Wu
2022-06-30 7:46 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-09 14:42 ` [sched/fair] 32fe13cd7a: phoronix-test-suite.fio.SequentialWrite.IO_uring.Yes.No.4KB.DefaultTestDirectory.mb_s -11.7% regression kernel test robot
2022-07-09 16:14 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-20 17:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] sched/fair: de-entropy for SIS filter Gautham R. Shenoy
2022-08-15 9:49 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-06 9:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] sched/fair: improve scan efficiency of SIS Abel Wu
2022-07-18 11:00 ` K Prateek Nayak
2022-08-15 13:59 ` Abel Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e72d9b4a-a986-3b73-d4e5-63df40a0bee1@bytedance.com \
--to=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®