mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: nick.hawkins@hpe.com
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, broonie@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	joel@jms.id.au, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, robh+dt@kernel.org, verdun@hpe.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] spi: spi-gxp: Add support for HPE GXP SoCs
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:04:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e75afa5a-a856-7747-cfcf-6dce5121c3af@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220720201158.78068-2-nick.hawkins@hpe.com>

Hi,

a few nitpicks below, should there be a v2.

Le 20/07/2022 à 22:11, nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org a écrit :
> From: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> 
> The GXP supports 3 separate SPI interfaces to accommodate the system
> flash, core flash, and other functions. The SPI engine supports variable
> clock frequency, selectable 3-byte or 4-byte addressing and a
> configurable x1, x2, and x4 command/address/data modes. The memory
> buffer for reading and writing ranges between 256 bytes and 8KB. This
> driver supports access to the core flash and bios part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins-ZPxbGqLxI0U@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>   drivers/spi/Kconfig   |   7 +
>   drivers/spi/Makefile  |   1 +
>   drivers/spi/spi-gxp.c | 355 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 363 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/spi/spi-gxp.c
> 

[...]

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-gxp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-gxp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..85e800718d8a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-gxp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,355 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0=or-later
> +/* Copyright (C) 2022 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. */
> +
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>

Same include twice.

> +#include <linux/spi/spi-mem.h>
> +

[...]

> +static int gxp_spi_read_reg(struct gxp_spi_chip *chip, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;

Useless initialization.

> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi = chip->spifi;
> +	void __iomem *reg_base = spifi->reg_base;
> +	u32 value;
> +	int cs;
> +
> +	cs = chip->cs;

Could be set in the initialization, as for the 2 other variables.
(if it makes sense)

> +
> +	value = readl(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +	value &= ~(1 << 24);
> +	value |= (cs << 24);
> +	value &= ~(0x07 << 16);
> +	value &= ~(0x1f << 19);
> +	writel(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +
> +	writel(0, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIADDR);
> +
> +	writeb(op->cmd.opcode, reg_base + OFFSET_SPICMD);
> +
> +	writew(op->data.nbytes, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIDCNT);
> +
> +	value = readb(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +	value &= ~SPIMCTRL_DIR;
> +	value |= SPIMCTRL_START;
> +
> +	writeb(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +
> +	ret = readb_poll_timeout(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL, value,
> +				 !(value & SPIMCTRL_BUSY),
> +				 GXP_SPI_SLEEP_TIME, GXP_SPI_TIMEOUT);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_warn(spifi->dev, "read reg busy time out\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, spifi->dat_base, op->data.nbytes);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int gxp_spi_write_reg(struct gxp_spi_chip *chip, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;

Useless initialization.

> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi = chip->spifi;
> +	void __iomem *reg_base = spifi->reg_base;
> +	u32 value;
> +	int cs;
> +
> +	cs = chip->cs;

Could be set in the initialization, as for the 2 other variables.
(if it makes sense)

> +
> +	value = readl(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +	value &= ~(1 << 24);
> +	value |= (cs << 24);
> +	value &= ~(0x07 << 16);
> +	value &= ~(0x1f << 19);
> +	writel(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +
> +	writel(0, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIADDR);
> +
> +	writeb(op->cmd.opcode, reg_base + OFFSET_SPICMD);
> +
> +	memcpy_toio(spifi->dat_base, op->data.buf.in, op->data.nbytes);
> +
> +	writew(op->data.nbytes, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIDCNT);
> +
> +	value = readb(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +	value |= SPIMCTRL_DIR;
> +	value |= SPIMCTRL_START;
> +
> +	writeb(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +
> +	ret = readb_poll_timeout(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL, value,
> +				 !(value & SPIMCTRL_BUSY),
> +				 GXP_SPI_SLEEP_TIME, GXP_SPI_TIMEOUT);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_warn(spifi->dev, "write reg busy time out\n");
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t gxp_spi_read(struct gxp_spi_chip *chip, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> +	int cs;
> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi = chip->spifi;
> +	u32 offset = op->addr.val;
> +
> +	cs = chip->cs;

Could be set in the initialization, as for the 2 other variables.
(if it makes sense)

> +
> +	if (cs == 0)
> +		offset += 0x4000000;
> +
> +	memcpy_fromio(op->data.buf.in, spifi->dir_base + offset, op->data.nbytes);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t gxp_spi_write(struct gxp_spi_chip *chip, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi = chip->spifi;
> +	void __iomem *reg_base = spifi->reg_base;
> +	u32 write_len;
> +	u32 value;
> +	int cs;
> +	int ret = 0;

Useless initialization.

> +
> +	cs = chip->cs;

Could be set in the initialization, as for the 2 other variables.
(if it makes sense)

> +
> +	write_len = op->data.nbytes;
> +	if (write_len > SPILDAT_LEN)
> +		write_len = SPILDAT_LEN;
> +
> +	value = readl(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +	value &= ~(1 << 24);
> +	value |= (cs << 24);
> +	value &= ~(0x07 << 16);
> +	value |= (op->addr.nbytes << 16);
> +	value &= ~(0x1f << 19);
> +	writel(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCFG);
> +
> +	writel(op->addr.val, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIADDR);
> +
> +	writeb(op->cmd.opcode, reg_base + OFFSET_SPICMD);
> +
> +	writew(write_len, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIDCNT);
> +
> +	memcpy_toio(spifi->dat_base, op->data.buf.in, write_len);
> +
> +	value = readb(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +	value |= SPIMCTRL_DIR;
> +	value |= SPIMCTRL_START;
> +
> +	writeb(value, reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL);
> +
> +	ret = readb_poll_timeout(reg_base + OFFSET_SPIMCTRL, value,
> +				 !(value & SPIMCTRL_BUSY),
> +				 GXP_SPI_SLEEP_TIME, GXP_SPI_TIMEOUT);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_warn(spifi->dev, "write busy time out\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return write_len;
> +}
> +
> +static int do_gxp_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> +{
> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi = spi_controller_get_devdata(mem->spi->master);
> +	struct gxp_spi_chip *chip = &spifi->chips[mem->spi->chip_select];

Useless empty line.

> +
> +	int ret = 0;

Useless initialization. (But I'm not sure the compiler is smart enough 
to see it)

> +
> +	if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) {
> +		if (!op->addr.nbytes)
> +			ret = gxp_spi_read_reg(chip, op);
> +		else
> +			ret = gxp_spi_read(chip, op);
> +	} else {
> +		if (!op->addr.nbytes)
> +			ret = gxp_spi_write_reg(chip, op);
> +		else
> +			ret = gxp_spi_write(chip, op);
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

[...]

> +static int gxp_spifi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	const struct gxp_spi_data *data;
> +	struct spi_controller *ctlr;
> +	struct gxp_spi *spifi;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (!data) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "of_dev_get_match_data failed\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	ctlr = devm_spi_alloc_master(dev, sizeof(*spifi));
> +	if (!ctlr) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spi_alloc_master failed\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	spifi = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
> +	if (!spifi) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spi_controller_get_data failed\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, spifi);
> +	spifi->data = data;
> +	spifi->dev = dev;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	spifi->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(spifi->reg_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(spifi->reg_base);
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> +	spifi->dat_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(spifi->dat_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(spifi->dat_base);
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
> +	spifi->dir_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(spifi->dir_base))
> +		return PTR_ERR(spifi->dir_base);
> +
> +	ctlr->mode_bits = data->mode_bits;
> +	ctlr->bus_num = pdev->id;
> +	ctlr->mem_ops = &gxp_spi_mem_ops;
> +	ctlr->setup = gxp_spi_setup;
> +	ctlr->num_chipselect = data->max_cs;
> +	ctlr->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
> +
> +	ret = devm_spi_register_controller(dev, ctlr);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spi_register_controller failed\n");
> +		return ret;

Could be return dev_err_probe(), but it is mostly a matter of taste, I 
guess.

CJ

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 20:11 [PATCH v1 0/5] Add SPI Driver to HPE GXP Architecture nick.hawkins
2022-07-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] spi: spi-gxp: Add support for HPE GXP SoCs nick.hawkins
2022-07-21 14:53   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-21 16:04   ` Christophe JAILLET [this message]
2022-07-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] spi: dt-bindings: add documentation for hpe,gxp-spifi nick.hawkins
2022-07-21 14:39   ` Rob Herring
2022-07-21 15:03   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] ARM: dts: hpe: Add spi driver node nick.hawkins
2022-07-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] ARM: configs: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable HPE GXP SPI driver nick.hawkins
2022-07-21 15:06   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-07-20 20:11 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] MAINTAINERS: add spi support to GXP nick.hawkins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e75afa5a-a856-7747-cfcf-6dce5121c3af@wanadoo.fr \
    --to=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=nick.hawkins@hpe.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=verdun@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®