mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	"Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: X86: Fix loss of exception which has not yet injected
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 14:27:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e75e1e1c-eebc-048a-6223-63d7fe984e85@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503483802-4420-2-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>

On 23/08/2017 12:23, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> @@ -6341,7 +6345,8 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
>  	int r;
>  
>  	/* try to reinject previous events if any */
> -	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending) {
> +	if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending ||
> +		vcpu->arch.exception.injected) {
>  		trace_kvm_inj_exception(vcpu->arch.exception.nr,
>  					vcpu->arch.exception.has_error_code,
>  					vcpu->arch.exception.error_code);
> @@ -6357,6 +6362,11 @@ static int inject_pending_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool req_int_win)
>  		}
>  
>  		r = kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception(vcpu);
> +		if (r == 0 && vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
> +			!vcpu->arch.exception.injected) {
> +			vcpu->arch.exception.pending = false;
> +			vcpu->arch.exception.injected = true;
> +		}
>  		return r;
>  	}
>  

There are some changes needed here:

- this "if" should check only .injected and call
kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception.  The "if" for .pending, which handles
rflags/dr7, assigns false to .pending and true to .injected, and also
calls kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception, should be after the call to
check_nested_events.

- in the call to inject_pending_event, the "else" should have a

	WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.exception.pending);

just for completeness.


Also, nested_vmx_check_exception has to be moved from
vmx_queue_exception to vmx_check_nested_events, so that
nested_run_pending is checked correctly.  Something like this:

        if (vcpu->arch.exception.pending &&
	    nested_vmx_check_exception(vcpu, &exit_qual)) {
		if (vmx->nested.nested_run_pending)
                        return -EBUSY;

		nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit(vcpu, exit_qual);
		return 0;
        }

Maybe you can have:

- patch 1 which I'll apply now

- patch 2 is the same as this one, with only the above changes to
inject_pending_event and the WARN_ON.

- patch 3 moves the nested_vmx_inject_exception_vmexit call from
nested_vmx_check_exception to vmx_queue_exception.

- patch 4 moves the code to vmx_check_nested_events and add the
nested_run_pending check, fixing the original bug.

As to GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS, for now I would not do any change.  Instead,
we can do

	/*
	 * FIXME: pass injected and pending separately.  This is only
	 * needed for nested virtualization, whose state cannot be
	 * migrated yet.  For now we combine them just in case.
	 */
	events->exception.injected =
		(vcpu->arch.exception.pending ||
		 vcpu->arch.exception.injected) &&
		!kvm_exception_is_soft(vcpu->arch.exception.nr);
	}

and set_vcpu_events can just set .injected = false.  Separating the two
will need a separate capability and KVM_ENABLE_CAP.

Paolo

> 
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index c2824d0..7c55916 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ struct kvm_reinject_control {
>  struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>  	struct {
>  		__u8 injected;
> +		__u8 pending;
>  		__u8 nr;
>  		__u8 has_error_code;
> -		__u8 pad;
>  		__u32 error_code;
>  	} exception;
>  	struct {

I think you don't need t

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-23 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-23 10:23 [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: use kvm_event_needs_reinjection Wanpeng Li
2017-08-23 10:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: X86: Fix loss of exception which has not yet injected Wanpeng Li
2017-08-23 12:27   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-08-24  4:30     ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e75e1e1c-eebc-048a-6223-63d7fe984e85@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®