From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752680AbcLFEAc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 5 Dec 2016 23:00:32 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:34070 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751590AbcLFEA3 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 5 Dec 2016 23:00:29 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] perf sched timehist: Cleanup idle_max_cpu handling
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
References: <20161206034010.6499-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
 <20161206034010.6499-6-namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e76abd58-a943-8f00-e55b-fdda802f649a@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:00:26 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20161206034010.6499-6-namhyung@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 12/5/16 7:40 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> It treats the idle_max_cpu little bit confusingly IMHO.  Let's make it
> more straight forward.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Seems correct. I've lost track of how idle_max_cpu ended up like that.

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>