mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: samir <samir@linux.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pseries/hotplug: Add CPU-to-node mappings for all present CPUs
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 15:11:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7d7ad26-42c8-468d-97a5-5fc5388091c0@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012155549.557256-2-srikar@linux.ibm.com>

Hello Srikar,

On 12/10/26 9:25 pm, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> When cores are added while the system is running in a lower SMT mode,
> some threads of those cores remain offline. Moving the system to a
> higher SMT mode later fails to online those threads.
>
> For example, on a system with four cores:
>
>    1. ppc64_cpu --smt=off
>    2. nproc
>         expected: 4
>    3. ppc64_cpu --smt
>         expected/actual: "SMT is off"
>    4. drmgr -c cpu -a -q 4
>    5. ppc64_cpu --smt
>         expected/actual: "SMT is off"
>    6. ppc64_cpu --smt=8
>    7. ppc64_cpu --smt
>         expected: SMT=8
>         actual:   SMT=1: 4-7; SMT=8: 0-3
>    8. nproc
>         expected: 64
>         actual:   36
>
> Post commit d1099e2276df ("powerpc/pseries: Honour current SMT state
> when DLPAR onlining CPUs"), when new CPUs are added, the CPU-to-node
> mapping is currently updated only for CPUs that are immediately onlined.
> CPUs that are made present but remain offline due to the current SMT
> mode therefore do not get a CPU-to-node mapping.
>
> When those CPUs are subsequently onlined after switching to a higher
> SMT mode, the online operation fails because the required CPU-to-node
> mapping is missing.
>
> Update the CPU-to-node mapping before applying the SMT restrictions so
> that all newly present CPUs have a node mapping, including CPUs that
> remain offline in the current SMT mode.
>
> Fixes: d1099e2276df ("powerpc/pseries: Honour current SMT state when DLPAR onlining CPUs")
> Reported-by: Samir Mulani <samir@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> index bc6926dbf148..b5dc942eec63 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
> @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ static int dlpar_online_cpu(struct device_node *dn)
>   			if (get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu) != thread)
>   				continue;
>   
> +			find_and_update_cpu_nid(cpu);
>   			if (!topology_is_primary_thread(cpu)) {
>   				if (cpu_smt_control != CPU_SMT_ENABLED)
>   					break;
> @@ -410,7 +411,6 @@ static int dlpar_online_cpu(struct device_node *dn)
>   			}
>   
>   			cpu_maps_update_done();
> -			find_and_update_cpu_nid(cpu);
>   			rc = device_online(get_cpu_device(cpu));
>   			if (rc) {
>   				dlpar_offline_cpu(dn);

I have verified the patch, and no issues were observed during testing. 
The patch has been tested successfully.


Please add the following Tested-by tag:
Tested-by: Samir Mulani <samir@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for the fix!

Regards,
Samir

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16  9:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-12 15:55 Srikar Dronamraju
2026-10-14  7:31 ` Nysal Jan K.A.
2026-10-16  9:41 ` samir [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7d7ad26-42c8-468d-97a5-5fc5388091c0@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=samir@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®