mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: "Kenneth Goldman" <kgoldman@us.ibm.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:37:27 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7d8f83e0808150337t5e699647wcc6ae296b3fa8c23@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080814111210.GI6995@ucw.cz>

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > And what happens when the chip simply goes away due to a hotplug action?
>> > Or not even the actual chip goes away but just the chip driver and you
>> > now dereference freed memory?
>>
>> Being a TCG/TPM person, I can only address the first question.  The
>> intent is that the TPM is soldered to the planar/motherboard (the TCG
>> uses the phrase "bound to the platform").  I can't imagine
>> any manufacturer designing a pluggable TPM.  It would subvert PCR
>
> Only 2 TPMs I've seen were on pluggable modules... which was fortunate
> because they slowed down boot by 5+ minutes, and broke it completely
> in other cases. Nickname 'kurvitko' (aka useless trash that breaks
> stuff). They are currently lying under my table, disconnected.
>
> (OTOH they were not on PCI, but on some low-count pin header).
>                                                        Pavel
Remember even soldered on stuff can fail.   How linux handles the
death of the TPM module needs to be covered.

Peter Dolding

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-15 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080808184349.999902616@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2008-08-08 18:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-09 18:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-11 21:13     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:30       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-12 20:57         ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-12 21:36           ` Alan Cox
2008-08-13 13:46             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-13 13:40               ` Alan Cox
2008-08-13 14:45                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-13 16:39                 ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-12 23:16           ` Greg KH
2008-08-13 13:58             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-13 16:56             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-14 11:12           ` Pavel Machek
2008-08-15 10:37             ` Peter Dolding [this message]
2008-08-15 18:50               ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-15 19:22                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-08-15 21:17                 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-18 15:01             ` Kenneth Goldman
2008-08-08 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/4] integrity: special fs magic Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 19:04   ` Greg KH
2008-08-08 19:15     ` Greg KH
2008-08-08 19:50       ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 23:07         ` Greg KH
2008-08-09 18:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-10 13:48         ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 19:36     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 23:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-08 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] integrity: Linux Integrity Module(LIM) Mimi Zohar
2008-08-09 18:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-10 13:52     ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-11 17:02       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-11 19:08         ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-11 19:56           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-12  8:41             ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-12 19:29               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-13 10:44                 ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-13 14:11                 ` David Howells
2008-08-13 22:57                   ` Peter Dolding
2008-08-13 17:03             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-12 21:19           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-08-13 17:03             ` Mimi Zohar
2008-08-12 19:25       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-08-08 18:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider Mimi Zohar
2008-08-08 20:06   ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-07 18:00 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-10-07 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-10-08  5:00   ` James Morris
2008-10-08 13:33     ` Rajiv Andrade
2008-11-13  3:47 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-11-13  3:47 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar
2008-11-20 16:43 [PATCH 0/4] integrity Mimi Zohar
2008-11-20 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7d8f83e0808150337t5e699647wcc6ae296b3fa8c23@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=oiaohm@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kgoldman@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®