From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A487A49D5BA; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 14:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790261698; cv=none; b=JAdCPd3yyWLE90126h4/AjOM0iE7Q54y7XHkvVIIjWrnlO0TMmSwBvDOE6HqArHhSLFvwW99CUPGW8ECufBfTMVZf9RPADkKsG5U2uGa1Ewqens2/EJLf8G8wHgCKRW+75w8omTeEd0KnND/Ak0GBftS7DhOvatN8ZhvTlnyRbQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790261698; c=relaxed/simple; bh=w7KRENjylDpHRXF+0mAtcXOZs1Kt5xjoiZU1rCb6qf0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=N5A+n6Fihu+sy2DTUYtx0a3GHgwx1eHlz7+/+EYk2TeqUSWeLl2yv/6Ce4Ed5VYyKoOdc8hZM5QVh3BEO2nlfRWqsR3yZODxe80XUXV+bZ/nn6RNorBy+AqoBHZSGYGcwcNhKf97+gUeG+INXCiHvOSdyEgqlmy1pVz1ea6uFTA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=qDaVCpLq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=permerror header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="qDaVCpLq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=N1WNg5JHUPqQIIGQ25bIiCEbs9M7MmOQ1D2fjs9reqk=; t=1790261690; x=1791471290; b=qDaVCpLqbo9RbgCNT4HwHRidPzn1CjnxW/zCCo4kpHijTlw x4J6zyG++HW5F1viHMUJjaJRQLjfUUQ8TEpcEEPk1dLuIMxNtyZMVJjImyZ8cZb2zUQQSR6HFU4/5 vLYf4+hOqxy1OYcdJsTFM9QWIuFBg3RffSXaXjHbeABjwWFVV8yxQke2nj0CEn9pkl83/91BndToO /IY8naUxVXJhBSCiSqnOmMxtCxX68oDiJQKkSy1THC3gm0m/qnLtx34TqC+sMXF76nhjiCwoY+T6R fwcs7LZyYGJ1W3KeANY6Kd19i4BxzTpg/kaq/65R4D8R54tEgUkPstuEkVORPzmw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__ECDSA_SECP256R1_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1x9kqH-000000096mJ-2ehS; Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:54:33 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: uapi: ptrace: guard register offset macros with __ASSEMBLER__ or __FRAME_OFFSETS From: Johannes Berg To: Nick Desaulniers , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Oleg Nesterov , Nathan Chancellor , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:54:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20260821-ptrace_uapi-v1-1-3de8638a29f2@google.com> References: <20260821-ptrace_uapi-v1-1-3de8638a29f2@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.60.2 (3.60.2-2.fc44) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Fri, 2026-08-21 at 15:45 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: >=20 > arch/x86/um/asm/ptrace.h | 4 +--- > arch/x86/um/ptrace_32.c | 1 + This seems like a simple adjustment for what you need to do in x86, so that's OK, but I don't think we'll take this through the UML tree. But for UML you can have my Acked-by: Johannes Berg johannes