From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16A3C77B6F for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229688AbjDKSyh (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:54:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43276 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229634AbjDKSyf (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:54:35 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260962136 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-32931475169so56675ab.0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:54:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; t=1681239270; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZV1VFO4BwOGmTu5eeP/n7pt3iT6IE643agWTPuh3G3Q=; b=DaVl9mSDc2bA1XJpVY/OPzKb4MvDhkvQlDbt5I/XunPwitCBKGSX1bEpm/5dM2k+Xi ml3kg+m66A57SjWHLnEOrJCnNTBeufUP4scPzA+IJza7ycm5cZIeSpuNACLxoEMwnVVx vd9R58YLw57t/FfCiuhKBKh0hv73g0bE3s2yo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681239270; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZV1VFO4BwOGmTu5eeP/n7pt3iT6IE643agWTPuh3G3Q=; b=EIS3tsNkBFIveNriL9mWOO/wLiElfQF3OdS52+nwx95NbQHjQfAwxZ9tesz9i4PTVt TCbyYJqA6vFYwqZNXlnuK2ahJD5uPnTzpz/TCigHdbMaI99qK0YSgd3wCBds81YIbQuW v0+Q5QQMCRTv06aAktq9pAbfd9Vd1dW3+GWLUw/FMbyb3P5LJXhAHBwltTsYuo5slRcQ OujTay4XEjCvEuedcKMzeP5d9ywcuo9JviQOSIOou6uqge1aRKqL74jh+/Fu/eXJrgwX nMgAgrNqj6snX+xQkHyFBMFmAdOHbJgrJ54tcILroTstgWIXo442ngmWZ014YivCAb52 f1hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fzwj+jnexF+MqYoHn0lBInM8qbe+Vtn0RBbdTM1XIk/+IeqWcU tqZ95QxHRAHYGr9n6xkpCqPhuw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YXICKD5X2IKxUuBIcAPBrrCjd+CmVQG6MMNHZTmReDEB8r7kzQBe0IDZV9T2VfGHNp3b/mfA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:12c9:b0:326:3b2e:95b1 with SMTP id i9-20020a056e0212c900b003263b2e95b1mr83576ilm.2.1681239270390; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([38.15.45.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i4-20020a056638380400b00408d59eccdcsm4218785jav.20.2023.04.11.11.54.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:54:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:54:29 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] tools/nolibc/stdio: Implement vprintf() Content-Language: en-US To: paulmck@kernel.org, Mark Brown Cc: Will Deacon , Willy Tarreau , Shuah Khan , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan References: <20230405-kselftest-nolibc-v2-0-2ac2495814b5@kernel.org> <20230405-kselftest-nolibc-v2-1-2ac2495814b5@kernel.org> <9dfb88e8-2a61-47a8-876e-581e4c717217@sirena.org.uk> <20230411150320.GA23045@willie-the-truck> <0144ab97-f34a-4803-8fdb-52340f2d73f2@sirena.org.uk> <6a323775-6274-4d0c-844a-da53146c2abe@paulmck-laptop> From: Shuah Khan In-Reply-To: <6a323775-6274-4d0c-844a-da53146c2abe@paulmck-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 4/11/23 10:44, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:13:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 04:03:21PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 03:31:10PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: >> >>>> It seems like more of a kselftest change than anything else so probably >>>> makes sense for it to go that way? The example user isn't really even >>>> needed. >> >>> Fine by me, as long as it doesn't conflict with any other arm64 selftest >>> changes you hope to land for 6.4. >> >> That shouldn't be an issue. > > Shuah, looks to me like this one is yours in kselftest, then. ;-) > > Thanx, Paul I will pick these up for Linux 6.4 thanks, -- Shuah